Shangqing Cao

Haoxuan Ma, Xishun Liao, Yifan Liu et al. · stanford

Human mobility modeling is critical for urban planning and transportation management, yet existing approaches often lack the integration capabilities needed to handle diverse data sources. We present a foundation model framework for universal human mobility patterns that leverages cross-domain data fusion and large language models to address these limitations. Our approach integrates multi-modal data of distinct nature and spatio-temporal resolution, including geographical, mobility, socio-demographic, and traffic information, to construct a privacy-preserving and semantically enriched human travel trajectory dataset. Our framework demonstrates adaptability through domain transfer techniques that ensure transferability across diverse urban contexts, as evidenced in case studies of Los Angeles (LA) and Egypt. The framework employs LLMs for semantic enrichment of trajectory data, enabling comprehensive understanding of mobility patterns. Quantitative evaluation shows that our generated synthetic dataset accurately reproduces mobility patterns observed in empirical data. The practical utility of this foundation model approach is demonstrated through large-scale traffic simulations for LA County, where results align well with observed traffic data. On California's I-405 corridor, the simulation yields a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 5.85% for traffic volume and 4.36% for speed compared to Caltrans PeMS observations, illustrating the framework's potential for intelligent transportation systems and urban mobility applications.

Shangqing Cao, Rishi Kumar Srinivasan, Raja Sengupta et al.

The airport access use case is a promising early-stage application for Urban Air Mobility (UAM). Understanding the operational paradigm of UAM at airports is crucial for making equitable and effective regulatory and management decisions. A central open question is whether UAM will be integrated into the airport transportation network as a conventional scheduled transit service, such as subways and rail, or as a Transportation Network Company (TNC) characterized by dynamic supply-demand matching. In this paper, we propose a two-stage framework for conducting an economic feasibility analysis of UAM networks. In the first stage, we introduce a joint-supply-demand variable pricing problem to evaluate the impact of dynamic pricing on UAM operations. This model uses a binary logit formulation to capture the trade-off between travel time advantages and fare levels. In the second stage, the determined demand is used as input for the Electric Urban Air Mobility Vehicle Routing Problem with Non-linear Charging Time (eUAMVRP-NL), which optimizes fleet scheduling and charging decisions to derive operating revenue and cost estimates. We apply this framework to a case study of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) access market with an eight-spoke vertiport network. Our results indicate that UAM operations benefit significantly from TNC-like management; a variable pricing policy can increase operating profits by more than 100\% compared to fixed-pricing schemes. Furthermore, we identify economies of stage length in longer UAM flights.

Jung Ho Park, Changyeob Lee, Shangqing Cao et al.

We examine how aircraft seat configuration interacts with daily operation in Regional Air Mobility by applying a joint supply-demand optimization framework that simultaneously determines market share, fare, and flight schedule. The framework integrates a binary logit discrete choice model into a task assignment formulation, capturing passengers' mode choice between Regional Air Mobility and driving across spatiotemporal origin-destination pairs. We evaluate three U.S. college town corridors under 4-, 6-, and 8-seat configurations across cost scales from 0.4 to 1.0 and fleet sizes from 12 to 30 aircraft. Profitability and throughput serve as primary performance metrics, and we analyze pricing power, operating cost, and revenue to explain performance variation across markets. We find that larger aircraft configurations and fleet sizes do not improve profitability universally. Larger aircraft are preferred where economies of scale are favorable and demand is sufficient and directionally balanced. The best configuration in these case studies is the 4-seat in imbalanced markets and the 6-seat in balanced or dense markets.