Bogyu Park

Seungbum Hong, Jihun Yoon, Bogyu Park et al.

The primary goal of training in early convolutional neural networks (CNN) is the higher generalization performance of the model. However, as the expected calibration error (ECE), which quantifies the explanatory power of model inference, was recently introduced, research on training models that can be explained is in progress. We hypothesized that a gap in supervision criteria during training and inference leads to overconfidence, and investigated that performing label distribution learning (LDL) would enhance the model calibration in CNN training. To verify this assumption, we used a simple LDL setting with recent data augmentation techniques. Based on a series of experiments, the following results are obtained: 1) State-of-the-art KD methods significantly impede model calibration. 2) Training using LDL with recent data augmentation can have excellent effects on model calibration and even in generalization performance. 3) Online LDL brings additional improvements in model calibration and accuracy with long training, especially in large-size models. Using the proposed approach, we simultaneously achieved a lower ECE and higher generalization performance for the image classification datasets CIFAR10, 100, STL10, and ImageNet. We performed several visualizations and analyses and witnessed several interesting behaviors in CNN training with the LDL.

Arnaud Huaulmé, Kanako Harada, Quang-Minh Nguyen et al.

This paper presents the design and results of the "PEg TRAnsfert Workflow recognition" (PETRAW) challenge whose objective was to develop surgical workflow recognition methods based on one or several modalities, among video, kinematic, and segmentation data, in order to study their added value. The PETRAW challenge provided a data set of 150 peg transfer sequences performed on a virtual simulator. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, semantic segmentation, and workflow annotations which described the sequences at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. Five tasks were proposed to the participants: three of them were related to the recognition of all granularities with one of the available modalities, while the others addressed the recognition with a combination of modalities. Average application-dependent balanced accuracy (AD-Accuracy) was used as evaluation metric to take unbalanced classes into account and because it is more clinically relevant than a frame-by-frame score. Seven teams participated in at least one task and four of them in all tasks. Best results are obtained with the use of the video and the kinematics data with an AD-Accuracy between 93% and 90% for the four teams who participated in all tasks. The improvement between video/kinematic-based methods and the uni-modality ones was significant for all of the teams. However, the difference in testing execution time between the video/kinematic-based and the kinematic-based methods has to be taken into consideration. Is it relevant to spend 20 to 200 times more computing time for less than 3% of improvement? The PETRAW data set is publicly available at www.synapse.org/PETRAW to encourage further research in surgical workflow recognition.