Yongheng Liu

Peng Peng, Weiwei Lin, Wentai Wu et al.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the knowledge boundary of large language models (LLMs) at inference by retrieving external documents as context. However, retrieval becomes increasingly time-consuming as the knowledge databases grow in size. Existing acceleration strategies either compromise accuracy through approximate retrieval, or achieve marginal gains by reusing results of strictly identical queries. We propose HaS, a homology-aware speculative retrieval framework that performs low-latency speculative retrieval over restricted scopes to obtain candidate documents, followed by validating whether they contain the required knowledge. The validation, grounded in the homology relation between queries, is formulated as a homologous query re-identification task: once a previously observed query is identified as a homologous re-encounter of the incoming query, the draft is deemed acceptable, allowing the system to bypass slow full-database retrieval. Benefiting from the prevalence of homologous queries under real-world popularity patterns, HaS achieves substantial efficiency gains. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HaS reduces retrieval latency by 23.74% and 36.99% across datasets with only a 1-2% marginal accuracy drop. As a plug-and-play solution, HaS also significantly accelerates complex multi-hop queries in modern agentic RAG pipelines. Source code is available at: https://github.com/ErrEqualsNil/HaS.

Yudao Sun, Juan Yin, Juan Zhao et al.

Neural network language models (LMs) are confronted with significant challenges in generalization and robustness. Currently, many studies focus on improving either generalization or robustness in isolation, without methods addressing both aspects simultaneously, which presents a significant challenge in developing LMs that are both robust and generalized. In this paper, we propose a bi-stage optimization framework to uniformly enhance both the generalization and robustness of LMs, termed UEGR. Specifically, during the forward propagation stage, we enrich the output probability distributions of adversarial samples by adaptive dropout to generate diverse sub models, and incorporate JS divergence and adversarial losses of these output distributions to reinforce output stability. During backward propagation stage, we compute parameter saliency scores and selectively update only the most critical parameters to minimize unnecessary deviations and consolidate the model's resilience. Theoretical analysis shows that our framework includes gradient regularization to limit the model's sensitivity to input perturbations and selective parameter updates to flatten the loss landscape, thus improving both generalization and robustness. The experimental results show that our method significantly improves the generalization and robustness of LMs compared to other existing methods across 13 publicly available language datasets, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.

Zhixiang Ren, Yongheng Liu, Tianhui Shi et al.

The plethora of complex artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and available high performance computing (HPC) power stimulates the expeditious development of AI components with heterogeneous designs. Consequently, the need for cross-stack performance benchmarking of AI-HPC systems emerges rapidly. The de facto HPC benchmark LINPACK can not reflect AI computing power and I/O performance without representative workload. The current popular AI benchmarks like MLPerf have fixed problem size therefore limited scalability. To address these issues, we propose an end-to-end benchmark suite utilizing automated machine learning (AutoML), which not only represents real AI scenarios, but also is auto-adaptively scalable to various scales of machines. We implement the algorithms in a highly parallel and flexible way to ensure the efficiency and optimization potential on diverse systems with customizable configurations. We utilize operations per second (OPS), which is measured in an analytical and systematic approach, as the major metric to quantify the AI performance. We perform evaluations on various systems to ensure the benchmark's stability and scalability, from 4 nodes with 32 NVIDIA Tesla T4 (56.1 Tera-OPS measured), up to 512 nodes with 4096 Huawei Ascend 910 (194.53 Peta-OPS measured), and the results show near-linear weak scalability. With flexible workload and single metric, our benchmark can scale and rank AI-HPC easily.