Tyler H. Chang

LG
h-index8
4papers
146citations
Novelty54%
AI Score35

4 Papers

11.0CLSep 4, 2022Code
Do Large Language Models know what humans know?

Sean Trott, Cameron Jones, Tyler Chang et al. · mit

Humans can attribute beliefs to others. However, it is unknown to what extent this ability results from an innate biological endowment or from experience accrued through child development, particularly exposure to language describing others' mental states. We test the viability of the language exposure hypothesis by assessing whether models exposed to large quantities of human language display sensitivity to the implied knowledge states of characters in written passages. In pre-registered analyses, we present a linguistic version of the False Belief Task to both human participants and a Large Language Model, GPT-3. Both are sensitive to others' beliefs, but while the language model significantly exceeds chance behavior, it does not perform as well as the humans, nor does it explain the full extent of their behavior -- despite being exposed to more language than a human would in a lifetime. This suggests that while statistical learning from language exposure may in part explain how humans develop the ability to reason about the mental states of others, other mechanisms are also responsible.

3.8LGApr 15, 2023Code
A framework for fully autonomous design of materials via multiobjective optimization and active learning: challenges and next steps

Tyler H. Chang, Jakob R. Elias, Stefan M. Wild et al.

In order to deploy machine learning in a real-world self-driving laboratory where data acquisition is costly and there are multiple competing design criteria, systems need to be able to intelligently sample while balancing performance trade-offs and constraints. For these reasons, we present an active learning process based on multiobjective black-box optimization with continuously updated machine learning models. This workflow is built on open-source technologies for real-time data streaming and modular multiobjective optimization software development. We demonstrate a proof of concept for this workflow through the autonomous operation of a continuous-flow chemistry laboratory, which identifies ideal manufacturing conditions for the electrolyte 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methyl carbonate.

3.8LGSep 26, 2023
Parallel Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization with Uniform Normalization and Bounded Objectives

Romain Egele, Tyler Chang, Yixuan Sun et al.

Machine learning (ML) methods offer a wide range of configurable hyperparameters that have a significant influence on their performance. While accuracy is a commonly used performance objective, in many settings, it is not sufficient. Optimizing the ML models with respect to multiple objectives such as accuracy, confidence, fairness, calibration, privacy, latency, and memory consumption is becoming crucial. To that end, hyperparameter optimization, the approach to systematically optimize the hyperparameters, which is already challenging for a single objective, is even more challenging for multiple objectives. In addition, the differences in objective scales, the failures, and the presence of outlier values in objectives make the problem even harder. We propose a multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MoBO) algorithm that addresses these problems through uniform objective normalization and randomized weights in scalarization. We increase the efficiency of our approach by imposing constraints on the objective to avoid exploring unnecessary configurations (e.g., insufficient accuracy). Finally, we leverage an approach to parallelize the MoBO which results in a 5x speed-up when using 16x more workers.

6.4LGApr 4, 2024Code
Leveraging Interpolation Models and Error Bounds for Verifiable Scientific Machine Learning

Tyler Chang, Andrew Gillette, Romit Maulik

Effective verification and validation techniques for modern scientific machine learning workflows are challenging to devise. Statistical methods are abundant and easily deployed, but often rely on speculative assumptions about the data and methods involved. Error bounds for classical interpolation techniques can provide mathematically rigorous estimates of accuracy, but often are difficult or impractical to determine computationally. In this work, we present a best-of-both-worlds approach to verifiable scientific machine learning by demonstrating that (1) multiple standard interpolation techniques have informative error bounds that can be computed or estimated efficiently; (2) comparative performance among distinct interpolants can aid in validation goals; (3) deploying interpolation methods on latent spaces generated by deep learning techniques enables some interpretability for black-box models. We present a detailed case study of our approach for predicting lift-drag ratios from airfoil images. Code developed for this work is available in a public Github repository.