Arnav Burudgunte

h-index48
2papers

2 Papers

LGMar 18, 2025
Better Private Distribution Testing by Leveraging Unverified Auxiliary Data

Maryam Aliakbarpour, Arnav Burudgunte, Clément Cannone et al.

We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data analyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorithms in this augmented setting for three flagship distribution testing tasks, uniformity, identity, and closeness testing, whose sample complexity smoothly scales with the claimed quality of the auxiliary information. We complement our algorithms with information-theoretic lower bounds, showing that their sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors).

SPDec 12, 2023
Sensor Placement for Learning in Flow Networks

Arnav Burudgunte, Arlei Silva

Large infrastructure networks (e.g. for transportation and power distribution) require constant monitoring for failures, congestion, and other adversarial events. However, assigning a sensor to every link in the network is often infeasible due to placement and maintenance costs. Instead, sensors can be placed only on a few key links, and machine learning algorithms can be leveraged for the inference of missing measurements (e.g. traffic counts, power flows) across the network. This paper investigates the sensor placement problem for networks. We first formalize the problem under a flow conservation assumption and show that it is NP-hard to place a fixed set of sensors optimally. Next, we propose an efficient and adaptive greedy heuristic for sensor placement that scales to large networks. Our experiments, using datasets from real-world application domains, show that the proposed approach enables more accurate inference than existing alternatives from the literature. We demonstrate that considering even imperfect or incomplete ground-truth estimates can vastly improve the prediction error, especially when a small number of sensors is available.