Yihang Pang

2papers

2 Papers

4.6LGFeb 2, 2024
Stochastic Two Points Method for Deep Model Zeroth-order Optimization

Yijiang Pang, Jiayu Zhou

Large foundation models, such as large language models, have performed exceptionally well in various application scenarios. Building or fully fine-tuning such large models is usually prohibitive due to either hardware budget or lack of access to backpropagation. The zeroth-order methods offer a promising direction for tackling this challenge, where only forward passes are needed to update the model. This paper introduces an efficient Stochastic Two-Point (S2P) approach within the gradient-free regime. We present the theoretical convergence properties of S2P under the general and relaxed smoothness assumptions, and the derived results help understand and inherently connect the two popular types of zeroth-order methods, basic random search and stochastic three-point method. The theoretical properties also shed light on a Variant of S2P (VS2P), through exploiting our new convergence properties that better represent the dynamics of deep models in training. Our comprehensive empirical results show that VS2P is highly effective in optimizing objectives for deep models. It outperforms or achieves competitive performance compared to standard methods across various model types and scales.

4.6LGMay 7, 2024
Towards Stability of Parameter-free Optimization

Yijiang Pang, Shuyang Yu, Bao Hoang et al.

Hyperparameter tuning, particularly the selection of an appropriate learning rate in adaptive gradient training methods, remains a challenge. To tackle this challenge, in this paper, we propose a novel parameter-free optimizer, \textsc{AdamG} (Adam with the golden step size), designed to automatically adapt to diverse optimization problems without manual tuning. The core technique underlying \textsc{AdamG} is our golden step size derived for the AdaGrad-Norm algorithm, which is expected to help AdaGrad-Norm preserve the tuning-free convergence and approximate the optimal step size in expectation w.r.t. various optimization scenarios. To better evaluate tuning-free performance, we propose a novel evaluation criterion, \textit{reliability}, to comprehensively assess the efficacy of parameter-free optimizers in addition to classical performance criteria. Empirical results demonstrate that compared with other parameter-free baselines, \textsc{AdamG} achieves superior performance, which is consistently on par with Adam using a manually tuned learning rate across various optimization tasks.