Ian Barnett

Shiyun Xu, Zhiqi Bu, Yiliang Zhang et al.

Differential learning rate (DLR), a technique that applies different learning rates to different model parameters, has been widely used in deep learning and achieved empirical success via its various forms. For example, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) applies zero learning rates to most parameters so as to significantly save the computational cost. At the core, DLR leverages the observation that different parameters can have different loss curvature, which is hard to characterize in general. We propose the Hessian-informed differential learning rate (Hi-DLR), an efficient approach that solves the hyperparameter optimization (HPO) of learning rates and captures the loss curvature for any model and optimizer adaptively. Given a proper grouping of parameters, we empirically demonstrate that Hi-DLR can improve the convergence by dynamically determining the learning rates during the training.

Riddhi Pratim Ghosh, Ian Barnett

This paper investigates two prominent probabilistic neural modeling paradigms: Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) and Mixture Density Networks (MDNs) for uncertainty-aware nonlinear regression. While BNNs incorporate epistemic uncertainty by placing prior distributions over network parameters, MDNs directly model the conditional output distribution, thereby capturing multimodal and heteroscedastic data-generating mechanisms. We present a unified theoretical and empirical framework comparing these approaches. On the theoretical side, we derive convergence rates and error bounds under Hölder smoothness conditions, showing that MDNs achieve faster Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence convergence due to their likelihood-based nature, whereas BNNs exhibit additional approximation bias induced by variational inference. Empirically, we evaluate both architectures on synthetic nonlinear datasets and a radiographic benchmark (RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge). Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that MDNs more effectively capture multimodal responses and adaptive uncertainty, whereas BNNs provide more interpretable epistemic uncertainty under limited data. Our findings clarify the complementary strengths of posterior-based and likelihood-based probabilistic learning, offering guidance for uncertainty-aware modeling in nonlinear systems.