CLJun 1
Multilingual Idioms in Sentences and Conversations Across High-, Medium-, and Low-Resource LanguagesSaeed Almheiri, Bilal Elbouardi, Salsabila Zahirah Pranida et al.
Idiomatic expressions pose a major challenge for multilingual NLP because their meanings shift between figurative and literal usage, often requiring context for accurate interpretation. Prior work has focused on high-resource languages typically evaluates isolated idiom-meaning questions, overlooking realistic discourse. We introduce MIDI, a multilingual idiom dataset spanning 3 high-, 3 medium-, and 12 low-resource languages, curated by native speakers. Unlike previous datasets, MIDI provides idioms embedded in both sentence-level and conversational contexts, capturing both literal and figurative readings. Benchmarking state-of-the-art models shows that idiom comprehension degrades in low-resource languages and that, in all resource tiers, literal interpretations are substantially harder than figurative ones. Conversational context improves performance but does not eliminate these disparities. Through controlled tests and interventions on hidden representations, we further separate memorization from reasoning, exposing core limitations of current models.
CLJun 18, 2022
RuArg-2022: Argument Mining EvaluationEvgeny Kotelnikov, Natalia Loukachevitch, Irina Nikishina et al.
Argumentation analysis is a field of computational linguistics that studies methods for extracting arguments from texts and the relationships between them, as well as building argumentation structure of texts. This paper is a report of the organizers on the first competition of argumentation analysis systems dealing with Russian language texts within the framework of the Dialogue conference. During the competition, the participants were offered two tasks: stance detection and argument classification. A corpus containing 9,550 sentences (comments on social media posts) on three topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic (vaccination, quarantine, and wearing masks) was prepared, annotated, and used for training and testing. The system that won the first place in both tasks used the NLI (Natural Language Inference) variant of the BERT architecture, automatic translation into English to apply a specialized BERT model, retrained on Twitter posts discussing COVID-19, as well as additional masking of target entities. This system showed the following results: for the stance detection task an F1-score of 0.6968, for the argument classification task an F1-score of 0.7404. We hope that the prepared dataset and baselines will help to foster further research on argument mining for the Russian language.
CLOct 3, 2023
Large Language Models Meet Knowledge Graphs to Answer Factoid QuestionsMikhail Salnikov, Hai Le, Prateek Rajput et al.
Recently, it has been shown that the incorporation of structured knowledge into Large Language Models significantly improves the results for a variety of NLP tasks. In this paper, we propose a method for exploring pre-trained Text-to-Text Language Models enriched with additional information from Knowledge Graphs for answering factoid questions. More specifically, we propose an algorithm for subgraphs extraction from a Knowledge Graph based on question entities and answer candidates. Then, we procure easily interpreted information with Transformer-based models through the linearization of the extracted subgraphs. Final re-ranking of the answer candidates with the extracted information boosts Hits@1 scores of the pre-trained text-to-text language models by 4-6%.
CLJun 18, 2024Code
Low-Resource Machine Translation through the Lens of Personalized Federated LearningViktor Moskvoretskii, Nazarii Tupitsa, Chris Biemann et al.
We present a new approach called MeritOpt based on the Personalized Federated Learning algorithm MeritFed that can be applied to Natural Language Tasks with heterogeneous data. We evaluate it on the Low-Resource Machine Translation task, using the datasets of South East Asian and Finno-Ugric languages. In addition to its effectiveness, MeritOpt is also highly interpretable, as it can be applied to track the impact of each language used for training. Our analysis reveals that target dataset size affects weight distribution across auxiliary languages, that unrelated languages do not interfere with the training, and auxiliary optimizer parameters have minimal impact. Our approach is easy to apply with a few lines of code, and we provide scripts for reproducing the experiments at https://github.com/VityaVitalich/MeritOpt.
CLMar 14, 2024Code
TaxoLLaMA: WordNet-based Model for Solving Multiple Lexical Semantic TasksViktor Moskvoretskii, Ekaterina Neminova, Alina Lobanova et al.
In this paper, we explore the capabilities of LLMs in capturing lexical-semantic knowledge from WordNet on the example of the LLaMA-2-7b model and test it on multiple lexical semantic tasks. As the outcome of our experiments, we present TaxoLLaMA, the everything-in-one model, lightweight due to 4-bit quantization and LoRA. It achieves 11 SotA results, 4 top-2 results out of 16 tasks for the Taxonomy Enrichment, Hypernym Discovery, Taxonomy Construction, and Lexical Entailment tasks. Moreover, it demonstrates very strong zero-shot performance on Lexical Entailment and Taxonomy Construction with no fine-tuning. We also explore its hidden multilingual and domain adaptation capabilities with a little tuning or few-shot learning. All datasets, code, and model are available online at https://github.com/VityaVitalich/TaxoLLaMA
CLJan 22, 2025
Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back HomeViktor Moskvoretskii, Maria Lysyuk, Mikhail Salnikov et al.
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) improves correctness of Question Answering (QA) and addresses hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet greatly increase computational costs. Besides, RAG is not always needed as may introduce irrelevant information. Recent adaptive retrieval methods integrate LLMs' intrinsic knowledge with external information appealing to LLM self-knowledge, but they often neglect efficiency evaluations and comparisons with uncertainty estimation techniques. We bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of 35 adaptive retrieval methods, including 8 recent approaches and 27 uncertainty estimation techniques, across 6 datasets using 10 metrics for QA performance, self-knowledge, and efficiency. Our findings show that uncertainty estimation techniques often outperform complex pipelines in terms of efficiency and self-knowledge, while maintaining comparable QA performance.
CLMar 11, 2025
Self-Taught Self-Correction for Small Language ModelsViktor Moskvoretskii, Chris Biemann, Irina Nikishina
Although large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across various tasks, they remain prone to errors. A key challenge is enabling them to self-correct. While prior research has relied on external tools or large proprietary models, this work explores self-correction in small language models (SLMs) through iterative fine-tuning using solely self-generated data. We introduce the Self-Taught Self-Correction (STaSC) algorithm, which incorporates multiple algorithmic design choices. Experimental results on a question-answering task demonstrate that STaSC effectively learns self-correction, leading to significant performance improvements. Our analysis further provides insights into the mechanisms of self-correction and the impact of different design choices on learning dynamics and overall performance. To support future research, we release our user-friendly codebase and lightweight models.
CLMar 5
Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without RetrievalArtem Vazhentsev, Maria Marina, Daniil Moskovskiy et al.
Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs). To enhance trust, natural language claims from diverse sources, including human-written text, web content, and model outputs, are commonly checked for factuality by retrieving external knowledge and using an LLM to verify the faithfulness of claims to the retrieved evidence. As a result, such methods are constrained by retrieval errors and external data availability, while leaving the models intrinsic fact-verification capabilities largely unused. We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source. To study this setting, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework focused on generalization, testing robustness to (i) long-tail knowledge, (ii) variation in claim sources, (iii) multilinguality, and (iv) long-form generation. Across 9 datasets, 18 methods and 3 models, our experiments indicate that logit-based approaches often underperform compared to those that leverage internal model representations. Building on this finding, we introduce INTRA, a method that exploits interactions between internal representations and achieves state-of-the-art performance with strong generalization. More broadly, our work establishes fact-checking without retrieval as a promising research direction that can complement retrieval-based frameworks, improve scalability, and enable the use of such systems as reward signals during training or as components integrated into the generation process.
CLMar 13, 2025
Do I look like a `cat.n.01` to you? A Taxonomy Image Generation BenchmarkViktor Moskvoretskii, Alina Lobanova, Ekaterina Neminova et al.
This paper explores the feasibility of using text-to-image models in a zero-shot setup to generate images for taxonomy concepts. While text-based methods for taxonomy enrichment are well-established, the potential of the visual dimension remains unexplored. To address this, we propose a comprehensive benchmark for Taxonomy Image Generation that assesses models' abilities to understand taxonomy concepts and generate relevant, high-quality images. The benchmark includes common-sense and randomly sampled WordNet concepts, alongside the LLM generated predictions. The 12 models are evaluated using 9 novel taxonomy-related text-to-image metrics and human feedback. Moreover, we pioneer the use of pairwise evaluation with GPT-4 feedback for image generation. Experimental results show that the ranking of models differs significantly from standard T2I tasks. Playground-v2 and FLUX consistently outperform across metrics and subsets and the retrieval-based approach performs poorly. These findings highlight the potential for automating the curation of structured data resources.
CLFeb 20, 2025
Argument-Based Comparative Question Answering Evaluation BenchmarkIrina Nikishina, Saba Anwar, Nikolay Dolgov et al.
In this paper, we aim to solve the problems standing in the way of automatic comparative question answering. To this end, we propose an evaluation framework to assess the quality of comparative question answering summaries. We formulate 15 criteria for assessing comparative answers created using manual annotation and annotation from 6 large language models and two comparative question asnwering datasets. We perform our tests using several LLMs and manual annotation under different settings and demonstrate the constituency of both evaluations. Our results demonstrate that the Llama-3 70B Instruct model demonstrates the best results for summary evaluation, while GPT-4 is the best for answering comparative questions. All used data, code, and evaluation results are publicly available\footnote{\url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/cqa-evaluation-benchmark-4561/README.md}}.
CLJan 21, 2022
Taxonomy Enrichment with Text and Graph Vector RepresentationsIrina Nikishina, Mikhail Tikhomirov, Varvara Logacheva et al.
Knowledge graphs such as DBpedia, Freebase or Wikidata always contain a taxonomic backbone that allows the arrangement and structuring of various concepts in accordance with the hypo-hypernym ("class-subclass") relationship. With the rapid growth of lexical resources for specific domains, the problem of automatic extension of the existing knowledge bases with new words is becoming more and more widespread. In this paper, we address the problem of taxonomy enrichment which aims at adding new words to the existing taxonomy. We present a new method that allows achieving high results on this task with little effort. It uses the resources which exist for the majority of languages, making the method universal. We extend our method by incorporating deep representations of graph structures like node2vec, Poincaré embeddings, GCN etc. that have recently demonstrated promising results on various NLP tasks. Furthermore, combining these representations with word embeddings allows us to beat the state of the art. We conduct a comprehensive study of the existing approaches to taxonomy enrichment based on word and graph vector representations and their fusion approaches. We also explore the ways of using deep learning architectures to extend the taxonomic backbones of knowledge graphs. We create a number of datasets for taxonomy extension for English and Russian. We achieve state-of-the-art results across different datasets and provide an in-depth error analysis of mistakes.
CLNov 23, 2020
Studying Taxonomy Enrichment on Diachronic WordNet VersionsIrina Nikishina, Alexander Panchenko, Varvara Logacheva et al.
Ontologies, taxonomies, and thesauri are used in many NLP tasks. However, most studies are focused on the creation of these lexical resources rather than the maintenance of the existing ones. Thus, we address the problem of taxonomy enrichment. We explore the possibilities of taxonomy extension in a resource-poor setting and present methods which are applicable to a large number of languages. We create novel English and Russian datasets for training and evaluating taxonomy enrichment models and describe a technique of creating such datasets for other languages.
CLMay 22, 2020
RUSSE'2020: Findings of the First Taxonomy Enrichment Task for the Russian languageIrina Nikishina, Varvara Logacheva, Alexander Panchenko et al.
This paper describes the results of the first shared task on taxonomy enrichment for the Russian language. The participants were asked to extend an existing taxonomy with previously unseen words: for each new word their systems should provide a ranked list of possible (candidate) hypernyms. In comparison to the previous tasks for other languages, our competition has a more realistic task setting: new words were provided without definitions. Instead, we provided a textual corpus where these new terms occurred. For this evaluation campaign, we developed a new evaluation dataset based on unpublished RuWordNet data. The shared task features two tracks: "nouns" and "verbs". 16 teams participated in the task demonstrating high results with more than half of them outperforming the provided baseline.