Wen-Sheng Lien

Yu-Kai Chan, Wen-Sheng Lien, Dong-Ting Yao et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on Knowledge Editing (KE) to maintain temporal validity, yet real-world knowledge is inherently n-ary. We demonstrate that in non-stationary environments, sequential updates to complex relations induce N-ary Structural Drift, a phenomenon where the binary reification of n-ary events into triples fractures relational atomicity. This precipitates Structure-Conditioned Knowledge Transfer Failure, a systematic mis-grounding of the retriever frequently misdiagnosed as parametric hallucination. To tackle this, we propose HyperPatch, a parameter-preserving framework that reformulates sequential KE as a stability problem over hypergraph manifolds. HyperPatch preserves event integrity through three phases: (i) Structural Prior Initialization, establishing a topology-aware embedding space via contrastive learning on a Hypergraph Neural Network (HGNN) to capture high-order correlations; (ii) Sequential Topology Editing, utilizing a dual-stage mechanism that employs SimHash-based Topological Alignment for rapid conflict resolution and Topological LoRA Adaptation to track drift without backbone retraining; and (iii) Structure-Conditioned Reasoning, which integrates globally consistent evidence from fused linguistic and structural manifolds. On the MQuAKE-CF and MQuAKE-T benchmarks, HyperPatch achieves relative gains in Hop-wise Accuracy (H-Acc) of 96.24% and 21.06% over the strongest baseline, respectively. Further ablations demonstrate superior reliability under continuous n-ary update streams, whereas the standard KG-based variant suffers H-Acc collapses of up to 88.3% due to structural misalignment.

Wen-Sheng Lien, Yu-Kai Chan, Hao-Lung Hsiao et al.

Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods, typically built on knowledge graphs (KGs) with binary relational facts, have shown promise in multi-hop open-domain QA. However, their rigid retrieval schemes and dense similarity search often introduce irrelevant context, increase computational overhead, and limit relational expressiveness. In contrast, n-ary hypergraphs encode higher-order relational facts that capture richer inter-entity dependencies and enable shallower, more efficient reasoning paths. To address this limitation, we propose HyperRAG, a RAG framework tailored for n-ary hypergraphs with two complementary retrieval variants: (i) HyperRetriever learns structural-semantic reasoning over n-ary facts to construct query-conditioned relational chains. It enables accurate factual tracking, adaptive high-order traversal, and interpretable multi-hop reasoning under context constraints. (ii) HyperMemory leverages the LLM's parametric memory to guide beam search, dynamically scoring n-ary facts and entities for query-aware path expansion. Extensive evaluations on WikiTopics (11 closed-domain datasets) and three open-domain QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, MuSiQue, and 2WikiMultiHopQA) validate HyperRAG's effectiveness. HyperRetriever achieves the highest answer accuracy overall, with average gains of 2.95% in MRR and 1.23% in Hits@10 over the strongest baseline. Qualitative analysis further shows that HyperRetriever bridges reasoning gaps through adaptive and interpretable n-ary chain construction, benefiting both open and closed-domain QA.

Tzu-Ling Lin, Wei-Chih Chen, Teng-Fang Hsiao et al.

Peer review is essential for maintaining academic quality, but the increasing volume of submissions places a significant burden on reviewers. Large language models (LLMs) offer potential assistance in this process, yet their susceptibility to textual adversarial attacks raises reliability concerns. This paper investigates the robustness of LLMs used as automated reviewers in the presence of such attacks. We focus on three key questions: (1) The effectiveness of LLMs in generating reviews compared to human reviewers. (2) The impact of adversarial attacks on the reliability of LLM-generated reviews. (3) Challenges and potential mitigation strategies for LLM-based review. Our evaluation reveals significant vulnerabilities, as text manipulations can distort LLM assessments. We offer a comprehensive evaluation of LLM performance in automated peer reviewing and analyze its robustness against adversarial attacks. Our findings emphasize the importance of addressing adversarial risks to ensure AI strengthens, rather than compromises, the integrity of scholarly communication.