Xuewen Dong

Di Lu, Qingwen Zhang, Yujia Liu et al.

Container runtimes provide a stable operational interface for deploying, monitoring, and controlling modern workloads, while trusted execution environments (TEEs) provide hardware-enforced isolation for sensitive computation. Existing confidential-container systems often rely on VM-backed deployment stacks or TEE-specific execution substrates, which can separate confidential execution from the conventional OCI runtime lifecycle. This paper presents EBCC (Enclave-Backed Confidential Containers), an OCI-compatible runtime architecture for managing composite confidential-computing workloads. EBCC treats the REE-side anchor and TEE-side confidential stages as a single containerized confidential-computing composite, preserves standard OCI lifecycle operations, and keeps TEE-specific execution behind a backend adapter. It also maintains persistent per-instance state and per-stage artifacts for request handling, response generation, logging, and evidence binding. We implement EBCC on a Keystone backend and evaluate its correctness, performance, footprint, and concurrent execution behavior. The results show that EBCC introduces additional latency over native Keystone execution, mainly due to lifecycle mediation, request validation, EID allocation, backend dispatch, and artifact persistence, while keeping the added footprint concentrated on host-side management state. Cross-TEE case studies on SGX, TDX, and OP-TEE show that the same lifecycle and stage abstraction can be mapped to enclave-style, VM-style, and embedded-style TEEs. These results indicate that EBCC can make TEE-backed execution manageable through an OCI-style lifecycle without materially enlarging the protected-side TCB.

Di Lu, Yongzhi Liao, Xutong Mu et al.

Host-acting agents promise a convenient interaction model in which users specify goals and the system determines how to realize them. We argue that this convenience introduces a distinct security problem: semantic under-specification in goal specification. User instructions are typically goal-oriented, yet they often leave process constraints, safety boundaries, persistence, and exposure insufficiently specified. As a result, the agent must complete missing execution semantics before acting, and this completion can produce risky host-side plans even when the user-stated goal is benign. In this paper, we develop a semantic threat model, present a taxonomy of semantic-induced risky completion patterns, and study the phenomenon through an OpenClaw-centered case study and execution-trace analysis. We further derive defense design principles for making execution boundaries explicit and constraining risky completion. These findings suggest that securing host-acting agents requires governing not only which actions are allowed at execution time, but also how goal-only instructions are translated into executable plans.

Di Lu, Bo Zhang, Xiyuan Li et al.

Self-hosted computer-use agents (SHCUAs), such as OpenClaw, combine natural-language interaction with direct access to host-side resources, including browsers, files, scripts, system commands, and external communication channels. While useful for automating real tasks, this capability also creates a host-level abuse surface: a legitimately deployed agent may be steered toward unsafe operations through malicious messages, indirect prompt injection, unsafe skills, or tampering along the host-side control path. We argue that such risks cannot be addressed by ad hoc blocking rules alone, because the security criticality of an operation depends jointly on its action type, target object, execution context, and potential effect. This paper presents an operation-centric model for risk-based confinement of SHCUA operations. The proposed design keeps ordinary functionality on the constrained REE path, while protecting security-critical classification, authorization, binding, evidence generation, and selected execution-control decisions inside a cloud-native TEE-backed trusted operation plane. We instantiate the architecture on OpenClaw using Intel TDX as the primary trusted backend, with remote terminal-side trusted components verifying TDX-audited commands before constrained local execution. The evaluation shows that the design can block unsafe or policy-disallowed operations before execution, preserve ordinary functionality for allowed workloads, and provide auditable evidence with deployment-dependent overhead.

Zhichao You, Xuewen Dong, Shujun Li et al.

Reconstruction attacks against federated learning (FL) aim to reconstruct users' samples through users' uploaded gradients. Local differential privacy (LDP) is regarded as an effective defense against various attacks, including sample reconstruction in FL, where gradients are clipped and perturbed. Existing attacks are ineffective in FL with LDP since clipped and perturbed gradients obliterate most sample information for reconstruction. Besides, existing attacks embed additional sample information into gradients to improve the attack effect and cause gradient expansion, leading to a more severe gradient clipping in FL with LDP. In this paper, we propose a sample reconstruction attack against LDP-based FL with any target models to reconstruct victims' sensitive samples to illustrate that FL with LDP is not flawless. Considering gradient expansion in reconstruction attacks and noise in LDP, the core of the proposed attack is gradient compression and reconstructed sample denoising. For gradient compression, an inference structure based on sample characteristics is presented to reduce redundant gradients against LDP. For reconstructed sample denoising, we artificially introduce zero gradients to observe noise distribution and scale confidence interval to filter the noise. Theoretical proof guarantees the effectiveness of the proposed attack. Evaluations show that the proposed attack is the only attack that reconstructs victims' training samples in LDP-based FL and has little impact on the target model's accuracy. We conclude that LDP-based FL needs further improvements to defend against sample reconstruction attacks effectively.

Xuewen Dong, Jiachen Li, Shujun Li et al.

Recent studies show that graph neural networks (GNNs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Existing backdoor attacks against GNNs use fixed-pattern triggers and lack reasonable trigger constraints, overlooking individual graph characteristics and rendering insufficient evasiveness. To tackle the above issues, we propose ABARC, the first Adaptive Backdoor Attack with Reasonable Constraints, applying to both graph-level and node-level tasks in GNNs. For graph-level tasks, we propose a subgraph backdoor attack independent of the graph's topology. It dynamically selects trigger nodes for each target graph and modifies node features with constraints based on graph similarity, feature range, and feature type. For node-level tasks, our attack begins with an analysis of node features, followed by selecting and modifying trigger features, which are then constrained by node similarity, feature range, and feature type. Furthermore, an adaptive edge-pruning mechanism is designed to reduce the impact of neighbors on target nodes, ensuring a high attack success rate (ASR). Experimental results show that even with reasonable constraints for attack evasiveness, our attack achieves a high ASR while incurring a marginal clean accuracy drop (CAD). When combined with the state-of-the-art defense randomized smoothing (RS) method, our attack maintains an ASR over 94%, surpassing existing attacks by more than 7%.