Q-Adapter: Customizing Pre-trained LLMs to New Preferences with Forgetting MitigationYi-Chen Li, Fuxiang Zhang, Wenjie Qiu et al.
Large Language Models (LLMs), trained on a large amount of corpus, have demonstrated remarkable abilities. However, it may not be sufficient to directly apply open-source LLMs like Llama to certain real-world scenarios, since most of them are trained for \emph{general} purposes. Thus, the demands for customizing publicly available LLMs emerge, but are currently under-studied. In this work, we consider customizing pre-trained LLMs with new human preferences. Specifically, the LLM should not only meet the new preference but also preserve its original capabilities after customization. Drawing inspiration from the observation that human preference can be expressed as a reward model, we propose to cast LLM customization as optimizing the sum of two reward functions, one of which (denoted as $r_1$) was used to pre-train the LLM while the other (denoted as $r_2$) characterizes the new human preference. The obstacle here is that both reward functions are unknown, making the application of modern reinforcement learning methods infeasible. Thanks to the residual Q-learning framework, we can restore the customized LLM with the pre-trained LLM and the \emph{residual Q-function} without the reward function $r_1$. Moreover, we find that for a fixed pre-trained LLM, the reward function $r_2$ can be derived from the residual Q-function, enabling us to directly learn the residual Q-function from the new human preference data upon the Bradley-Terry model. We name our method Q-Adapter as it introduces an adapter module to approximate the residual Q-function for customizing the pre-trained LLM towards the new preference. Experiments based on the Llama-3.1 model on the DSP dataset and HH-RLHF dataset illustrate the superior effectiveness of Q-Adapter on both retaining existing knowledge and learning new preferences. Code is available at https://github.com/mansicer/Q-Adapter.
3.8LGMar 9, 2023
Beware of Instantaneous Dependence in Reinforcement LearningZhengmao Zhu, Yuren Liu, Honglong Tian et al.
Playing an important role in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL), environment models aim to predict future states based on the past. Existing works usually ignore instantaneous dependence in the state, that is, assuming that the future state variables are conditionally independent given the past states. However, instantaneous dependence is prevalent in many RL environments. For instance, in the stock market, instantaneous dependence can exist between two stocks because the fluctuation of one stock can quickly affect the other and the resolution of price change is lower than that of the effect. In this paper, we prove that with few exceptions, ignoring instantaneous dependence can result in suboptimal policy learning in MBRL. To address the suboptimality problem, we propose a simple plug-and-play method to enable existing MBRL algorithms to take instantaneous dependence into account. Through experiments on two benchmarks, we (1) confirm the existence of instantaneous dependence with visualization; (2) validate our theoretical findings that ignoring instantaneous dependence leads to suboptimal policy; (3) verify that our method effectively enables reinforcement learning with instantaneous dependence and improves policy performance.
3.3LGApr 22, 2022
MNL-Bandits under Inventory and Limited Switches ConstraintsHongbin Zhang, Yu Yang, Feng Wu et al.
Optimizing the assortment of products to display to customers is a key to increasing revenue for both offline and online retailers. To trade-off between exploring customers' preference and exploiting customers' choices learned from data, in this paper, by adopting the Multi-Nomial Logit (MNL) choice model to capture customers' choices over products, we study the problem of optimizing assortments over a planning horizon $T$ for maximizing the profit of the retailer. To make the problem setting more practical, we consider both the inventory constraint and the limited switches constraint, where the retailer cannot use up the resource inventory before time $T$ and is forbidden to switch the assortment shown to customers too many times. Such a setting suits the case when an online retailer wants to dynamically optimize the assortment selection for a population of customers. We develop an efficient UCB-like algorithm to optimize the assortments while learning customers' choices from data. We prove that our algorithm can achieve a sub-linear regret bound $\tilde{O}\left(T^{1-α/2}\right)$ if $O(T^α)$ switches are allowed. %, and our regret bound is optimal with respect to $T$. Extensive numerical experiments show that our algorithm outperforms baselines and the gap between our algorithm's performance and the theoretical upper bound is small.
17.0LGOct 30, 2024
Return Augmented Decision Transformer for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement LearningRuhan Wang, Yu Yang, Zhishuai Liu et al.
We study offline off-dynamics reinforcement learning (RL) to utilize data from an easily accessible source domain to enhance policy learning in a target domain with limited data. Our approach centers on return-conditioned supervised learning (RCSL), particularly focusing on the decision transformer (DT), which can predict actions conditioned on desired return guidance and complete trajectory history. Previous works tackle the dynamics shift problem by augmenting the reward in the trajectory from the source domain to match the optimal trajectory in the target domain. However, this strategy can not be directly applicable in RCSL owing to (1) the unique form of the RCSL policy class, which explicitly depends on the return, and (2) the absence of a straightforward representation of the optimal trajectory distribution. We propose the Return Augmented Decision Transformer (RADT) method, where we augment the return in the source domain by aligning its distribution with that in the target domain. We provide the theoretical analysis demonstrating that the RCSL policy learned from RADT achieves the same level of suboptimality as would be obtained without a dynamics shift. We introduce two practical implementations RADT-DARA and RADT-MV respectively. Extensive experiments conducted on D4RL datasets reveal that our methods generally outperform dynamic programming based methods in off-dynamics RL scenarios.
2.7CLJun 17, 2025
S$^4$C: Speculative Sampling with Syntactic and Semantic Coherence for Efficient Inference of Large Language ModelsTao He, Guang Huang, Yu Yang et al.
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse downstream tasks. However, their autoregressive nature leads to substantial inference latency, posing challenges for real-time applications. Speculative sampling mitigates this issue by introducing a drafting phase followed by a parallel validation phase, enabling faster token generation and verification. Existing approaches, however, overlook the inherent coherence in text generation, limiting their efficiency. To address this gap, we propose a Speculative Sampling with Syntactic and Semantic Coherence (S$^4$C) framework, which extends speculative sampling by leveraging multi-head drafting for rapid token generation and a continuous verification tree for efficient candidate validation and feature reuse. Experimental results demonstrate that S$^4$C surpasses baseline methods across mainstream tasks, offering enhanced efficiency, parallelism, and the ability to generate more valid tokens with fewer computational resources. On Spec-bench benchmarks, S$^4$C achieves an acceleration ratio of 2.26x-2.60x, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
MOBODY: Model Based Off-Dynamics Offline Reinforcement LearningYihong Guo, Yu Yang, Pan Xu et al.
We study off-dynamics offline reinforcement learning, where the goal is to learn a policy from offline source and limited target datasets with mismatched dynamics. Existing methods either penalize the reward or discard source transitions occurring in parts of the transition space with high dynamics shift. As a result, they optimize the policy using data from low-shift regions, limiting exploration of high-reward states in the target domain that do not fall within these regions. Consequently, such methods often fail when the dynamics shift is significant or the optimal trajectories lie outside the low-shift regions. To overcome this limitation, we propose MOBODY, a Model-Based Off-Dynamics Offline RL algorithm that optimizes a policy using learned target dynamics transitions to explore the target domain, rather than only being trained with the low dynamics-shift transitions. For the dynamics learning, built on the observation that achieving the same next state requires taking different actions in different domains, MOBODY employs separate action encoders for each domain to encode different actions to the shared latent space while sharing a unified representation of states and a common transition function. We further introduce a target Q-weighted behavior cloning loss in policy optimization to avoid out-of-distribution actions, which push the policy toward actions with high target-domain Q-values, rather than high source domain Q-values or uniformly imitating all actions in the offline dataset. We evaluate MOBODY on a wide range of MuJoCo and Adroit benchmarks, demonstrating that it outperforms state-of-the-art off-dynamics RL baselines as well as policy learning methods based on different dynamics learning baselines, with especially pronounced improvements in challenging scenarios where existing methods struggle.
18.1CYJun 25, 2024
AI Risk Categorization Decoded (AIR 2024): From Government Regulations to Corporate PoliciesYi Zeng, Kevin Klyman, Andy Zhou et al.
We present a comprehensive AI risk taxonomy derived from eight government policies from the European Union, United States, and China and 16 company policies worldwide, making a significant step towards establishing a unified language for generative AI safety evaluation. We identify 314 unique risk categories organized into a four-tiered taxonomy. At the highest level, this taxonomy encompasses System & Operational Risks, Content Safety Risks, Societal Risks, and Legal & Rights Risks. The taxonomy establishes connections between various descriptions and approaches to risk, highlighting the overlaps and discrepancies between public and private sector conceptions of risk. By providing this unified framework, we aim to advance AI safety through information sharing across sectors and the promotion of best practices in risk mitigation for generative AI models and systems.