Provably Secure Networks: Methodology and Toolset for Configuration ManagementCornelius Diekmann
Network administration is an inherently complex task, in particular with regard to security. Using the Isabelle interactive proof assistant, we develop two automated, formally verified tools which help uncovering and preventing bugs in network-level access control configurations. Our first tool guides the process of designing networks from scratch. Our second tool facilitates the analysis of existing iptables configurations. Combined, the two form a powerful toolset.
5.5CRAug 16, 2016
Privacy Assessment of Software Architectures based on Static Taint AnalysisMarcel von Maltitz, Cornelius Diekmann, Georg Carle
Privacy analysis is critical but also a time-consuming and tedious task. We present a formalization which eases designing and auditing high-level privacy properties of software architectures. It is incorporated into a larger policy analysis and verification framework and enables the assessment of commonly accepted data protection goals of privacy. The formalization is based on static taint analysis and makes flow and processing of privacy-critical data explicit, globally as well as on the level of individual data subjects. Formally, we show equivalence to traditional label-based information flow security and prove overall soundness of our tool with Isabelle/HOL. We demonstrate applicability in two real-world case studies, thereby uncovering previously unknown violations of privacy constraints in the analyzed software architectures.
13.5CRMay 6, 2014
Directed Security Policies: A Stateful Network ImplementationCornelius Diekmann, Lars Hupel, Georg Carle
Large systems are commonly internetworked. A security policy describes the communication relationship between the networked entities. The security policy defines rules, for example that A can connect to B, which results in a directed graph. However, this policy is often implemented in the network, for example by firewalls, such that A can establish a connection to B and all packets belonging to established connections are allowed. This stateful implementation is usually required for the network's functionality, but it introduces the backflow from B to A, which might contradict the security policy. We derive compliance criteria for a policy and its stateful implementation. In particular, we provide a criterion to verify the lack of side effects in linear time. Algorithms to automatically construct a stateful implementation of security policy rules are presented, which narrows the gap between formalization and real-world implementation. The solution scales to large networks, which is confirmed by a large real-world case study. Its correctness is guaranteed by the Isabelle/HOL theorem prover.