9.6CLNov 10, 2025
Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction TuningTingyu Jiang, Shen Li, Yiyao Song et al.
Instruction tuning plays a critical role in enhancing the performance and efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). Its success depends not only on the quality of the instruction data but also on the inherent capabilities of the LLM itself. Some studies suggest that even a small amount of high-quality data can achieve instruction fine-tuning results that are on par with, or even exceed, those from using a full-scale dataset. However, rather than focusing solely on calculating data quality scores to evaluate instruction data, there is a growing need to select high-quality data that maximally enhances the performance of instruction tuning for a given LLM. In this paper, we propose the Model Instruction Weakness Value (MIWV) as a novel metric to quantify the importance of instruction data in enhancing model's capabilities. The MIWV metric is derived from the discrepancies in the model's responses when using In-Context Learning (ICL), helping identify the most beneficial data for enhancing instruction tuning performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that selecting only the top 1\% of data based on MIWV can outperform training on the full dataset. Furthermore, this approach extends beyond existing research that focuses on data quality scoring for data selection, offering strong empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of our proposed method.
10.1LGFeb 23, 2020
On the Role of Dataset Quality and Heterogeneity in Model ConfidenceYuan Zhao, Jiasi Chen, Samet Oymak
Safety-critical applications require machine learning models that output accurate and calibrated probabilities. While uncalibrated deep networks are known to make over-confident predictions, it is unclear how model confidence is impacted by the variations in the data, such as label noise or class size. In this paper, we investigate the role of the dataset quality by studying the impact of dataset size and the label noise on the model confidence. We theoretically explain and experimentally demonstrate that, surprisingly, label noise in the training data leads to under-confident networks, while reduced dataset size leads to over-confident models. We then study the impact of dataset heterogeneity, where data quality varies across classes, on model confidence. We demonstrate that this leads to heterogenous confidence/accuracy behavior in the test data and is poorly handled by the standard calibration algorithms. To overcome this, we propose an intuitive heterogenous calibration technique and show that the proposed approach leads to improved calibration metrics (both average and worst-case errors) on the CIFAR datasets.
4.7LGSep 27, 2018
Supervised Nonnegative Matrix Factorization to Predict ICU Mortality RiskGuoqing Chao, Chengsheng Mao, Fei Wang et al.
ICU mortality risk prediction is a tough yet important task. On one hand, due to the complex temporal data collected, it is difficult to identify the effective features and interpret them easily; on the other hand, good prediction can help clinicians take timely actions to prevent the mortality. These correspond to the interpretability and accuracy problems. Most existing methods lack of the interpretability, but recently Subgraph Augmented Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (SANMF) has been successfully applied to time series data to provide a path to interpret the features well. Therefore, we adopted this approach as the backbone to analyze the patient data. One limitation of the raw SANMF method is its poor prediction ability due to its unsupervised nature. To deal with this problem, we proposed a supervised SANMF algorithm by integrating the logistic regression loss function into the NMF framework and solved it with an alternating optimization procedure. We used the simulation data to verify the effectiveness of this method, and then we applied it to ICU mortality risk prediction and demonstrated its superiority over other conventional supervised NMF methods.
3.2IRJun 12, 2018
Are My EHRs Private Enough? -Event-level Privacy ProtectionChengsheng Mao, Yuan Zhao, Mengxin Sun et al.
Privacy is a major concern in sharing human subject data to researchers for secondary analyses. A simple binary consent (opt-in or not) may significantly reduce the amount of sharable data, since many patients might only be concerned about a few sensitive medical conditions rather than the entire medical records. We propose event-level privacy protection, and develop a feature ablation method to protect event-level privacy in electronic medical records. Using a list of 13 sensitive diagnoses, we evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of the proposed method. As feature ablation progresses, the identifiability of a sensitive medical condition decreases with varying speeds on different diseases. We find that these sensitive diagnoses can be divided into 3 categories: (1) 5 diseases have fast declining identifiability (AUC below 0.6 with less than 400 features excluded); (2) 7 diseases with progressively declining identifiability (AUC below 0.7 with between 200 and 700 features excluded); and (3) 1 disease with slowly declining identifiability (AUC above 0.7 with 1000 features excluded). The fact that the majority (12 out of 13) of the sensitive diseases fall into the first two categories suggests the potential of the proposed feature ablation method as a solution for event-level record privacy protection.