Bowen Li

Bowen Li, Hanlin Gu, Ruoxin Chen et al.

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach for collaborative model training without sharing private data. However, privacy concerns regarding information exchanged during FL have received significant research attention. Gradient Inversion Attacks (GIAs) have been proposed to reconstruct the private data retained by local clients from the exchanged gradients. While recovering private data, the data dimensions and the model complexity increase, which thwart data reconstruction by GIAs. Existing methods adopt prior knowledge about private data to overcome those challenges. In this paper, we first observe that GIAs with gradients from a single iteration fail to reconstruct private data due to insufficient dimensions of leaked gradients, complex model architectures, and invalid gradient information. We investigate a Temporal Gradient Inversion Attack with a Robust Optimization framework, called TGIAs-RO, which recovers private data without any prior knowledge by leveraging multiple temporal gradients. To eliminate the negative impacts of outliers, e.g., invalid gradients for collaborative optimization, robust statistics are proposed. Theoretical guarantees on the recovery performance and robustness of TGIAs-RO against invalid gradients are also provided. Extensive empirical results on MNIST, CIFAR10, ImageNet and Reuters 21578 datasets show that the proposed TGIAs-RO with 10 temporal gradients improves reconstruction performance compared to state-of-the-art methods, even for large batch sizes (up to 128), complex models like ResNet18, and large datasets like ImageNet (224*224 pixels). Furthermore, the proposed attack method inspires further exploration of privacy-preserving methods in the context of FL.

Linghao Zhang, Shilin He, Chaoyun Zhang et al.

The issue-resolving task, where a model generates patches to fix real-world bugs, has emerged as a critical benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While SWE-bench and its variants have become standard in this domain, they suffer from key limitations: they have not been updated since their initial releases, cover a narrow set of repositories, and depend heavily on manual effort for instance construction and environment setup. These factors hinder scalability and introduce risks of overfitting and data contamination. In this work, we present SWE-bench-Live, a live-updatable benchmark designed to overcome these challenges. Our initial release consists of 1,319 tasks derived from real GitHub issues created since 2024, spanning 93 repositories. Each task is accompanied by a dedicated Docker image to ensure reproducible execution. Central to our benchmark is \method, an automated curation pipeline that streamlines the entire process from instance creation to environment setup, removing manual bottlenecks and enabling scalability and continuous updates. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art agent frameworks and LLMs on SWE-bench-Live, revealing a substantial performance gap compared to static benchmarks like SWE-bench, even under controlled evaluation conditions. To better understand this discrepancy, we perform detailed analyses across repository origin, issue recency, and task difficulty. By providing a fresh, diverse, and executable benchmark grounded in live repository activity, SWE-bench-Live facilitates rigorous, contamination-resistant evaluation of LLMs and agents in dynamic, real-world software development settings.

Linghao Zhang, Junhao Wang, Shilin He et al.

Large Language Models have advanced automated software development, however, it remains a challenge to correctly infer dependencies, namely, identifying the internal components and external packages required for a repository to successfully run. Existing studies highlight that dependency-related issues cause over 40\% of observed runtime errors on the generated repository. To address this, we introduce DI-BENCH, a large-scale benchmark and evaluation framework specifically designed to assess LLMs' capability on dependency inference. The benchmark features 581 repositories with testing environments across Python, C#, Rust, and JavaScript. Extensive experiments with textual and execution-based metrics reveal that the current best-performing model achieves only a 42.9% execution pass rate, indicating significant room for improvement. DI-BENCH establishes a new viewpoint for evaluating LLM performance on repositories, paving the way for more robust end-to-end software synthesis.