Bo Yuan

Zhenpeng Zhang, Jinwei Lu, Yurui Dong et al.

Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measured from B-mode ultrasound is an established vascular biomarker for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk stratification. Although a wide range of computerized methods have been proposed for carotid boundary delineation and CIMT estimation, robust and transferable deep models that jointly address segmentation and measurement remain underexplored, particularly in the era of vision foundation models. Motivated by recent advances in adapting DINOv3 to medical segmentation and exploiting DINOv3 in test-time optimization pipelines, we investigate a DINOv3-based framework for carotid intima-media complex segmentation and subsequent CIMT measurement on the Carotid Ultrasound Boundary Study (CUBS) v1 dataset. Our pipeline predicts the intima-media band at a fixed image resolution, extracts upper and lower boundaries column-wise, corrects for image resizing using the per-image calibration factor provided by CUBS, and reports CIMT in physical units. Across three patient-level test splits, our method achieved a mean test Dice of 0.7739 $\pm$ 0.0037 and IoU of 0.6384 $\pm$ 0.0044. The mean CIMT absolute error was 181.16 $\pm$ 11.57 $μ$m, with a mean Pearson correlation of 0.480 $\pm$ 0.259. In a held-out validation subset ($n=28$), test-time threshold calibration reduced the mean absolute CIMT error from 141.0 $μ$m at the default threshold to 101.1 $μ$m at the measurement-optimized threshold, while simultaneously reducing systematic bias toward zero. Relative to the error ranges reported in the original CUBS benchmark for classical computerized methods, these results place a DINOv3-based approach within the clinically relevant $\sim$0.1 mm measurement regime. Together, our findings support the feasibility of using vision foundation models for interpretable, calibration-aware CIMT measurement.

Qingquan Zhang, Qiqi Duan, Bo Yuan et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in the field of artificial intelligence, showcasing their ability to interact with humans and influence human cognition through information dissemination. However, recent studies have brought to light instances of bias inherent within these LLMs, presenting a critical issue that demands attention. In our research, we delve deeper into the intricate challenge of harmonising accuracy and fairness in the enhancement of LLMs. While improving accuracy can indeed enhance overall LLM performance, it often occurs at the expense of fairness. Overemphasising optimisation of one metric invariably leads to a significant degradation of the other. This underscores the necessity of taking into account multiple considerations during the design and optimisation phases of LLMs. Therefore, we advocate for reformulating the LLM training process as a multi-objective learning task. Our investigation reveals that multi-objective evolutionary learning (MOEL) methodologies offer promising avenues for tackling this challenge. Our MOEL framework enables the simultaneous optimisation of both accuracy and fairness metrics, resulting in a Pareto-optimal set of LLMs. In summary, our study sheds valuable lights on the delicate equilibrium between accuracy and fairness within LLMs, which is increasingly significant for their real-world applications. By harnessing MOEL, we present a promising pathway towards fairer and more efficacious AI technologies.