Yangjie Zhou

Jiale Xu, Rui Zhang, Yi Xiong et al.

Large Language Models are increasingly being deployed in datacenters. Serving these models requires careful memory management, as their memory usage includes static weights, dynamic activations, and key-value caches. While static weights are constant and predictable, dynamic components such as activations and KV caches change frequently during runtime, presenting significant challenges for efficient memory management. Modern LLM serving systems typically handle runtime memory and KV caches at distinct abstraction levels: runtime memory management relies on static tensor abstractions, whereas KV caches utilize a page table-based virtualization layer built on top of the tensor abstraction. This virtualization dynamically manages KV caches to mitigate memory fragmentation. However, this dual-level approach fundamentally isolates runtime memory and KV cache management, resulting in suboptimal memory utilization under dynamic workloads, which can lead to a nearly 20% drop in throughput. To address these limitations, we propose eLLM, an elastic memory management framework inspired by the classical memory ballooning mechanism in operating systems. The core components of eLLM include: (1) Virtual Tensor Abstraction, which decouples the virtual address space of tensors from the physical GPU memory, creating a unified and flexible memory pool; (2) an Elastic Memory Mechanism that dynamically adjusts memory allocation through runtime memory inflation and deflation, leveraging CPU memory as an extensible buffer; and (3) a Lightweight Scheduling Strategy employing SLO-aware policies to optimize memory utilization and effectively balance performance trade-offs under stringent SLO constraints. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that eLLM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art systems, 2.32x higher decoding throughput, and supporting 3x larger batch sizes for 128K-token inputs.

Zhengyi Li, Cong Guo, Zhanda Zhu et al.

Post-training quantization attracts increasing attention due to its convenience in deploying quantized neural networks. Although rounding-to-nearest remains the prevailing method for DNN quantization, prior research has demonstrated its suboptimal nature when applied to weight quantization. They propose optimizing weight rounding schemes by leveraging output error rather than the traditional weight quantization error. Our study reveals that similar rounding challenges also extend to activation quantization. Despite the easy generalization, the challenges lie in the dynamic nature of activation. Adaptive rounding is expected for varying activations and the method is subjected to runtime overhead. To tackle this, we propose the AQuant quantization framework with a novel perspective to reduce output error by adjusting rounding schemes of activations. Instead of using the constant rounding border 0.5 of the rounding-to-nearest operation, we make the border become a function w.r.t. the activation value to change the activation rounding by the adaptive border. To deal with the runtime overhead, we use a coarse-grained version of the border function. Finally, we introduce our framework to optimize the border function. Extensive experiments show that AQuant achieves notable improvements compared to state-of-the-art works and pushes the accuracy of ResNet-18 up to 60.31% under the 2-bit weight and activation quantization.

Shuwen Lu, Zhihui Zhang, Cong Guo et al.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown significant accuracy improvements in a variety of graph learning domains, sparking considerable research interest. To translate these accuracy improvements into practical applications, it is essential to develop high-performance and efficient hardware acceleration for GNN models. However, designing GNN accelerators faces two fundamental challenges: the high bandwidth requirement of GNN models and the diversity of GNN models. Previous works have addressed the first challenge by using more expensive memory interfaces to achieve higher bandwidth. For the second challenge, existing works either support specific GNN models or have generic designs with poor hardware utilization. In this work, we tackle both challenges simultaneously. First, we identify a new type of partition-level operator fusion, which we utilize to internally reduce the high bandwidth requirement of GNNs. Next, we introduce partition-level multi-threading to schedule the concurrent processing of graph partitions, utilizing different hardware resources. To further reduce the extra on-chip memory required by multi-threading, we propose fine-grained graph partitioning to generate denser graph partitions. Importantly, these three methods make no assumptions about the targeted GNN models, addressing the challenge of model variety. We implement these methods in a framework called SwitchBlade, consisting of a compiler, a graph partitioner, and a hardware accelerator. Our evaluation demonstrates that SwitchBlade achieves an average speedup of $1.85\times$ and energy savings of $19.03\times$ compared to the NVIDIA V100 GPU. Additionally, SwitchBlade delivers performance comparable to state-of-the-art specialized accelerators.

Yangjie Zhou, Yaoxu Song, Jingwen Leng et al.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for exploring and learning from graph structures and features. As such, achieving high-performance execution for GNNs becomes crucially important. Prior works have proposed to explore the sparsity (i.e., low density) in the input graph to accelerate GNNs, which uses the full-graph-level or block-level sparsity format. We show that they fail to balance the sparsity benefit and kernel execution efficiency. In this paper, we propose a novel system, referred to as AdaptGear, that addresses the challenge of optimizing GNNs performance by leveraging kernels tailored to the density characteristics at the subgraph level. Meanwhile, we also propose a method that dynamically chooses the optimal set of kernels for a given input graph. Our evaluation shows that AdaptGear can achieve a significant performance improvement, up to $6.49 \times$ ($1.87 \times$ on average), over the state-of-the-art works on two mainstream NVIDIA GPUs across various datasets.