Wanying Qu

Xin Zhang, Yabo Chen, Yijie Fang et al.

Recent generative video models achieve impressive visual quality but remain constrained by limited physical consistency and controllability. Existing video generation methods provide minimal physical control, and single-image-to-3D conversion approaches often suffer from object interpenetration. Furthermore, physics-based scene-level 3D generation methods exhibit spatial misalignment, stylized artifacts, and inconsistencies with the input data, restricting their use in realistic interactive video synthesis. We propose TelePhysics, a training-free framework that converts a single image into a physically consistent and controllable video through holistic scene-level 3D reconstruction. By representing the full scene geometry in a unified spatial coordinate system, TelePhysics resolves object penetration and alignment ambiguity. Unlike prior methods, this formulation enables accurate scenelevel multi-object interactions and introduces richer, complex control types for advanced mechanicsbased manipulation. By decoupling simulation from rendering, TelePhysics bypasses latency-heavy priors, achieving real-time physical interaction previews paired while preserving photorealistic visual fidelity. Experimental results demonstrate that TelePhysics substantially outperforms prior methods in physical fidelity, spatial coherence, and controllability. The open-source code is available at https://github.com/xinzhang007/TelePhysics.

Jiyao Liu, Junzhi Ning, Wanying Qu et al.

Medical image quality assessment (Med-IQA) is a prerequisite for clinical AI deployment, yet multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still fall substantially short of human experts, particularly when required to provide descriptive assessments with clinical reasoning beyond simple quality scores. However, improving them is hindered by the high cost of acquiring descriptive annotations and by the inability of one-time data collection to adapt to the model's evolving weaknesses. To address these challenges, we propose MedQ-Engine, a closed-loop data engine that iteratively evaluates the model to discover failure prototypes via data-driven clustering, explores a million-scale image pool using these prototypes as retrieval anchors with progressive human-in-the-loop annotation, and evolves through quality-assured fine-tuning, forming a self-improving cycle. Models are evaluated on complementary perception and description tasks. An entropy-guided routing mechanism triages annotations to minimize labeling cost. Experiments across five medical imaging modalities show that MedQ-Engine elevates an 8B-parameter model to surpass GPT-4o by over 13% and narrow the gap with human experts to only 4.34%, using only 10K annotations with more than 4x sample efficiency over random sampling.

Jiyao Liu, Junzhi Ning, Wanying Qu et al.

Existing medical image restoration (Med-IR) methods are typically modality-specific or degradation-specific, failing to generalize across the heterogeneous degradations encountered in clinical practice. We argue this limitation stems from the isolation of Med-IR from medical image quality assessment (Med-IQA), as restoration models without explicit quality understanding struggle to adapt to diverse degradation types across modalities. To address these challenges, we propose MedQ-UNI, a unified vision-language model that follows an assess-then-restore paradigm, explicitly leveraging Med-IQA to guide Med-IR across arbitrary modalities and degradation types. MedQ-UNI adopts a multimodal autoregressive dual-expert architecture with shared attention: a quality assessment expert first identifies degradation issues through structured natural language descriptions, and a restoration expert then conditions on these descriptions to perform targeted image restoration. To support this paradigm, we construct a large-scale dataset of approximately 50K paired samples spanning three imaging modalities and five restoration tasks, each annotated with structured quality descriptions for joint Med-IQA and Med-IR training, along with a 2K-sample benchmark for evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that a single MedQ-UNI model, without any task-specific adaptation, achieves state-of-the-art restoration performance across all tasks while generating superior descriptions, confirming that explicit quality understanding meaningfully improves restoration fidelity and interpretability.

Jiyao Liu, Jinjie Wei, Wanying Qu et al.

Medical Image Quality Assessment (IQA) serves as the first-mile safety gate for clinical AI, yet existing approaches remain constrained by scalar, score-based metrics and fail to reflect the descriptive, human-like reasoning process central to expert evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce MedQ-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that establishes a perception-reasoning paradigm for language-based evaluation of medical image quality with Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). MedQ-Bench defines two complementary tasks: (1) MedQ-Perception, which probes low-level perceptual capability via human-curated questions on fundamental visual attributes; and (2) MedQ-Reasoning, encompassing both no-reference and comparison reasoning tasks, aligning model evaluation with human-like reasoning on image quality. The benchmark spans five imaging modalities and over forty quality attributes, totaling 2,600 perceptual queries and 708 reasoning assessments, covering diverse image sources including authentic clinical acquisitions, images with simulated degradations via physics-based reconstructions, and AI-generated images. To evaluate reasoning ability, we propose a multi-dimensional judging protocol that assesses model outputs along four complementary axes. We further conduct rigorous human-AI alignment validation by comparing LLM-based judgement with radiologists. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art MLLMs demonstrates that models exhibit preliminary but unstable perceptual and reasoning skills, with insufficient accuracy for reliable clinical use. These findings highlight the need for targeted optimization of MLLMs in medical IQA. We hope that MedQ-Bench will catalyze further exploration and unlock the untapped potential of MLLMs for medical image quality evaluation.

Jiyao Liu, Junzhi Ning, Chenglong Ma et al.

Despite impressive performance on standard benchmarks, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face critical challenges in real-world clinical environments where medical images inevitably suffer various quality degradations. Existing benchmarks exhibit two key limitations: (1) absence of large-scale, multidimensional assessment across medical image quality gradients and (2) no systematic confidence calibration analysis. To address these gaps, we present MedQ-Deg, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating medical MLLMs under image quality degradations. MedQ-Deg provides multi-dimensional evaluation spanning 18 distinct degradation types, 30 fine-grained capability dimensions, and 7 imaging modalities, with 24,894 question-answer pairs. Each degradation is implemented at 3 severity degrees, calibrated by expert radiologists. We further introduce Calibration Shift metric, which quantifies the gap between a model's perceived confidence and actual performance to assess metacognitive reliability under degradation. Our comprehensive evaluation of 40 mainstream MLLMs reveals several critical findings: (1) overall model performance degrades systematically as degradation severity increases, (2) models universally exhibit the AI Dunning-Kruger Effect, maintaining inappropriately high confidence despite severe accuracy collapse, and (3) models display markedly differentiated behavioral patterns across capability dimensions, imaging modalities, and degradation types. We hope MedQ-Deg drives progress toward medical MLLMs that are robust and trustworthy in real clinical practice.