Hossein Nasiri

Joshua Roy Palathinkal, Hardani Ismu Nabil, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman et al.

The recently deployed 6 GHz spectrum in the U.S. utilizes distinct power categories, with the latest proposed "Geofenced Variable Power" (GVP) category permitting indoor and outdoor operations without continuous Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) by relying instead on local databases of exclusion zones. Consequently, the safe operation of GVP devices depends entirely on reliable GNSS localization to respect these geofences. However, GNSS accuracy is highly variable and significantly degrades in environments like urban canyons or indoors. This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study evaluating GNSS reliability specifically for GVP compliance. Utilizing the SigCap Android application, we document and compare GNSS accuracy across an extensive array of real-world conditions, encompassing urban versus suburban landscapes, varying mobility states (stationary, walking, driving), and indoor versus outdoor settings. The results demonstrate that while device hardware causes variations in GNSS accuracy, the operational environment is the primary driver of error. Indoor settings and dense urban areas consistently degrade localization. Moreover, outdoor positions adjacent to buildings often surprisingly produce significant inaccuracies, even near low-elevation structures. We further analyze the contribution of different GNSS constellations to device positioning and show that satellites from non-U.S.-licensed constellations-although currently used in a substantial portion of location fixes-are not permitted for regulatory geolocation under FCC requirements.

Hossein Nasiri, Seda Dogan-Tusha, Francis A. Gatsi et al.

The U.S. has adopted four power regimes for opera tion in the shared unlicensed 6 GHz band -- standard power (SP), low-power indoor (LPI), geofenced variable power (GVP), and very low power (VLP) -- with maximum permitted EIRP levels of 36 dBm, 30 dBm, 24 dBm, and 14 dBm, respectively. Although these regimes are primarily intended to protect incumbent services, their heterogeneous transmit power levels also introduce additional coexistence challenges within 6 GHz Wi-Fi networks. In this paper, we develop an ns-3 Wi-Fi 6E/802.11ax coexistence testbed to study coexistence under heterogeneous power regimes and to provide a reproducible simulation methodology. To the best of our knowledge, prior work has not specifically examined self-coexistence issues within 6 GHz Wi-Fi networks. We evaluate two coexistence scenarios: one in which both the LPI AP and the SP AP are indoors, and another in which the LPI AP is indoors while the SP AP is outdoors. Results are compared against an indoor LPI--LPI baseline when applicable. Our findings show that: (i) the presence of an indoor SP AP can significantly degrade the goodput of an LPI AP; (ii) channel bandwidth is a key factor in determining the extent of SP-to-LPI impact, with the degradation being most severe at 20 MHz and partially alleviated at 160 MHz; (iii) physical blockage between outdoor SP and LPI APs improves fairness; and (iv) BSS coloring does not necessarily improve fairness in mixed-regime deployments. The simulation framework can be extended to study coexistence between Wi-Fi and cellular systems, as recently proposed by Ofcom in the U.K.

Hossein Nasiri, Seda Dogan-Tusha, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman et al.

Robust classification of the operational environment of wireless devices is becoming increasingly important for wireless network optimization, particularly in a shared spectrum environment. Distinguishing between indoor and outdoor devices can enhance reliability and improve coexistence with existing, outdoor, incumbents. For instance, the unlicensed but shared 6 GHz band (5.925 - 7.125 GHz) enables sharing by imposing lower transmit power for indoor unlicensed devices and a spectrum coordination requirement for outdoor devices. Further, indoor devices are prohibited from using battery power, external antennas, and weatherization to prevent outdoor operations. As these rules may be circumvented, we propose a robust indoor/outdoor classification method by leveraging the fact that the radio-frequency environment faced by a device are quite different indoors and outdoors. We first collect signal strength data from all cellular and Wi-Fi bands that can be received by a smartphone in various environments (indoor interior, indoor near windows, and outdoors), along with GPS accuracy, and then evaluate three machine learning (ML) methods: deep neural network (DNN), decision tree, and random forest to perform classification into these three categories. Our results indicate that the DNN model performs the best, particularly in minimizing the most important classification error, that of classifying outdoor devices as indoor interior devices.