Marzana Khatun

Haichuan Li, Liguo Zhou, Zhenshan Bing et al.

Several autonomous driving strategies have been applied to autonomous vehicles, especially in the collision avoidance area. The purpose of collision avoidance is achieved by adjusting the trajectory of autonomous vehicles (AV) to avoid intersection or overlap with the trajectory of surrounding vehicles. A large number of sophisticated vision algorithms have been designed for target inspection, classification, and other tasks, such as ResNet, YOLO, etc., which have achieved excellent performance in vision tasks because of their ability to accurately and quickly capture regional features. However, due to the variability of different tasks, the above models achieve good performance in capturing small regions but are still insufficient in correlating the regional features of the input image with each other. In this paper, we aim to solve this problem and develop an algorithm that takes into account the advantages of CNN in capturing regional features while establishing feature correlation between regions using variants of attention. Finally, our model achieves better performance in the test set of L5Kit compared to the other vision models. The average number of collisions is 19.4 per 10000 frames of driving distance, which greatly improves the success rate of collision avoidance.

Milin Patel, Rolf Jung, Marzana Khatun

In the automobile industry, ensuring the safety of automated vehicles equipped with the Automated Driving System (ADS) is becoming a significant focus due to the increasing development and deployment of automated driving. Automated driving depends on sensing both the external and internal environments of a vehicle, utilizing perception sensors and algorithms, and Electrical/Electronic (E/E) systems for situational awareness and response. ISO 21448 is the standard for Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) that aims to ensure that the ADS operate safely within their intended functionality. SOTIF focuses on preventing or mitigating potential hazards that may arise from the limitations or failures of the ADS, including hazards due to insufficiencies of specification, or performance insufficiencies, as well as foreseeable misuse of the intended functionality. However, the challenge lies in ensuring the safety of vehicles despite the limited availability of extensive and systematic literature on SOTIF. To address this challenge, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on SOTIF for the ADS is performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The objective is to methodically gather and analyze the existing literature on SOTIF. The major contributions of this paper are: (i) presenting a summary of the literature by synthesizing and organizing the collective findings, methodologies, and insights into distinct thematic groups, and (ii) summarizing and categorizing the acknowledged limitations based on data extracted from an SLR of 51 research papers published between 2018 and 2023. Furthermore, research gaps are determined, and future research directions are proposed.

Antonino Armato, Marzana Khatun, Sebastian Fischer

The automotive industry faces increasing challenges in ensuring both functional safety (FuSa) and cybersecurity for complex semiconductor devices. Traditional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) primarily addresses safety-related failure modes, often overlooking synergistic vulnerabilities and shared consequences with cybersecurity threats. This paper introduces an Integrated Failure and Threat Mode and Effect Analysis (FTMEA) framework that systematically co-analyzes FuSa and cybersecurity. A cornerstone of this framework is the introduction of rigorously defined Cross-Domain Correlation Factors (CDCFs), which quantify the interdependencies and mutual influences between safety-related failures and cybersecurity threats. These factors are derived from a combination of structured expert knowledge, static structural analysis metrics (e.g., Controllability/Observability), and validated against empirical data from fault/attack injection campaigns. We propose a modified Risk Priority Number (RPN) calculation that systematically integrates these correlation factors, enabling a more accurate and transparent prioritization of risks that span both domains. A detailed case study involving an automotive ASIC configuration register proves the practical application of the FTMEA. We present explicit mapping tables, quantitative CDCF values, and a comparative analysis against a baseline FMEA/TARA (Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment), illustrating how the integrated approach uncovers previously masked cross-domain risks, improves mitigation strategy effectiveness, and provides a clear quantitative justification for the derived correlation values. This framework offers a unified, traceable, methodology for risk assessment in critical automotive systems, thereby overcoming the limitations of conventional analyses and promoting optimized, cross-disciplinary development.