Jonas Rieger

Kai-Robin Lange, Jonas Rieger, Carsten Jentsch

Unsupervised text classification, with its most common form being sentiment analysis, used to be performed by counting words in a text that were stored in a lexicon, which assigns each word to one class or as a neutral word. In recent years, these lexicon-based methods fell out of favor and were replaced by computationally demanding fine-tuning techniques for encoder-only models such as BERT and zero-shot classification using decoder-only models such as GPT-4. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach: Lex2Sent, which provides improvement over classic lexicon methods but does not require any GPU or external hardware. To classify texts, we train embedding models to determine the distances between document embeddings and the embeddings of the parts of a suitable lexicon. We employ resampling, which results in a bagging effect, boosting the performance of the classification. We show that our model outperforms lexica and provides a basis for a high performing few-shot fine-tuning approach in the task of binary sentiment analysis.

Imene Kolli, Kai-Robin Lange, Jonas Rieger et al.

We propose an interpretable, graph-based framework for analyzing semantic shift in diachronic corpora. For each target word and time slice, we induce a word-centered semantic network that integrates distributional similarity from diachronic Skip-gram embeddings with lexical substitutability from time-specific masked language models. We identify sense-related structure by clustering the peripheral graph, align clusters across time via node overlap, and track change through cluster composition and normalized cluster mass. In an application study on a corpus of New York Times Magazine articles (1980 - 2017), we show that graph connectivity reflects polysemy dynamics and that the induced communities capture contrasting trajectories: event-driven sense replacement (trump), semantic stability with cluster over-segmentation effects (god), and gradual association shifts tied to digital communication (post). Overall, word-centered semantic graphs offer a compact and transparent representation for exploring sense evolution without relying on predefined sense inventories.

Jonas Rieger, Kostiantyn Yanchenko, Mattes Ruckdeschel et al.

Pre-trained language models (PLM) based on transformer neural networks developed in the field of natural language processing (NLP) offer great opportunities to improve automatic content analysis in communication science, especially for the coding of complex semantic categories in large datasets via supervised machine learning. However, three characteristics so far impeded the widespread adoption of the methods in the applying disciplines: the dominance of English language models in NLP research, the necessary computing resources, and the effort required to produce training data to fine-tune PLMs. In this study, we address these challenges by using a multilingual transformer model in combination with the adapter extension to transformers, and few-shot learning methods. We test our approach on a realistic use case from communication science to automatically detect claims and arguments together with their stance in the German news debate on arms deliveries to Ukraine. In three experiments, we evaluate (1) data preprocessing strategies and model variants for this task, (2) the performance of different few-shot learning methods, and (3) how well the best setup performs on varying training set sizes in terms of validity, reliability, replicability and reproducibility of the results. We find that our proposed combination of transformer adapters with pattern exploiting training provides a parameter-efficient and easily shareable alternative to fully fine-tuning PLMs. It performs on par in terms of validity, while overall, provides better properties for application in communication studies. The results also show that pre-fine-tuning for a task on a near-domain dataset leads to substantial improvement, in particular in the few-shot setting. Further, the results indicate that it is useful to bias the dataset away from the viewpoints of specific prominent individuals.

Kai-Robin Lange, Jonas Rieger, Niklas Benner et al.

From a monarchy to a democracy, to a dictatorship and back to a democracy -- the German political landscape has been constantly changing ever since the first German national state was formed in 1871. After World War II, the Federal Republic of Germany was formed in 1949. Since then every plenary session of the German Bundestag was logged and even has been digitized over the course of the last few years. We analyze these texts using a time series variant of the topic model LDA to investigate which events had a lasting effect on the political discourse and how the political topics changed over time. This allows us to detect changes in word frequency (and thus key discussion points) in political discourse.

Jonas Rieger, Mattes Ruckdeschel, Gregor Wiedemann

Few-shot learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) are crucial to overcome the challenges of data scarcity and ever growing language model sizes. This applies in particular to specialized scientific domains, where researchers might lack expertise and resources to fine-tune high-performing language models to nuanced tasks. We propose PETapter, a novel method that effectively combines PEFT methods with PET-style classification heads to boost few-shot learning capabilities without the significant computational overhead typically associated with full model training. We validate our approach on three established NLP benchmark datasets and one real-world dataset from communication research. We show that PETapter not only achieves comparable performance to full few-shot fine-tuning using pattern-exploiting training (PET), but also provides greater reliability and higher parameter efficiency while enabling higher modularity and easy sharing of the trained modules, which enables more researchers to utilize high-performing NLP-methods in their research.

Kai-Robin Lange, Niklas Benner, Lars Grönberg et al.

Text data is inherently temporal. The meaning of words and phrases changes over time, and the context in which they are used is constantly evolving. This is not just true for social media data, where the language used is rapidly influenced by current events, memes and trends, but also for journalistic, economic or political text data. Most NLP techniques however consider the corpus at hand to be homogenous in regard to time. This is a simplification that can lead to biased results, as the meaning of words and phrases can change over time. For instance, running a classic Latent Dirichlet Allocation on a corpus that spans several years is not enough to capture changes in the topics over time, but only portraits an "average" topic distribution over the whole time span. Researchers have developed a number of tools for analyzing text data over time. However, these tools are often scattered across different packages and libraries, making it difficult for researchers to use them in a consistent and reproducible way. The ttta package is supposed to serve as a collection of tools for analyzing text data over time.

Jonas Rieger, Lars Koppers, Carsten Jentsch et al.

For organizing large text corpora topic modeling provides useful tools. A widely used method is Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a generative probabilistic model which models single texts in a collection of texts as mixtures of latent topics. The assignments of words to topics rely on initial values such that generally the outcome of LDA is not fully reproducible. In addition, the reassignment via Gibbs Sampling is based on conditional distributions, leading to different results in replicated runs on the same text data. This fact is often neglected in everyday practice. We aim to improve the reliability of LDA results. Therefore, we study the stability of LDA by comparing assignments from replicated runs. We propose to quantify the similarity of two generated topics by a modified Jaccard coefficient. Using such similarities, topics can be clustered. A new pruning algorithm for hierarchical clustering results based on the idea that two LDA runs create pairs of similar topics is proposed. This approach leads to the new measure S-CLOP ({\bf S}imilarity of multiple sets by {\bf C}lustering with {\bf LO}cal {\bf P}runing) for quantifying the stability of LDA models. We discuss some characteristics of this measure and illustrate it with an application to real data consisting of newspaper articles from \textit{USA Today}. Our results show that the measure S-CLOP is useful for assessing the stability of LDA models or any other topic modeling procedure that characterize its topics by word distributions. Based on the newly proposed measure for LDA stability, we propose a method to increase the reliability and hence to improve the reproducibility of empirical findings based on topic modeling. This increase in reliability is obtained by running the LDA several times and taking as prototype the most representative run, that is the LDA run with highest average similarity to all other runs.