Fairness and bias correction in machine learning for depression prediction: results from four study populationsVien Ngoc Dang, Anna Cascarano, Rosa H. Mulder et al.
A significant level of stigma and inequality exists in mental healthcare, especially in under-served populations. Inequalities are reflected in the data collected for scientific purposes. When not properly accounted for, machine learning (ML) models leart from data can reinforce these structural inequalities or biases. Here, we present a systematic study of bias in ML models designed to predict depression in four different case studies covering different countries and populations. We find that standard ML approaches show regularly biased behaviors. We also show that mitigation techniques, both standard and our own post-hoc method, can be effective in reducing the level of unfair bias. No single best ML model for depression prediction provides equality of outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing fairness during model selection and transparent reporting about the impact of debiasing interventions. Finally, we provide practical recommendations to develop bias-aware ML models for depression risk prediction.
1.0MLApr 26, 2018
Candidate Labeling for Crowd LearningIker Beñaran-Muñoz, Jerónimo Hernández-González, Aritz Pérez
Crowdsourcing has become very popular among the machine learning community as a way to obtain labels that allow a ground truth to be estimated for a given dataset. In most of the approaches that use crowdsourced labels, annotators are asked to provide, for each presented instance, a single class label. Such a request could be inefficient, that is, considering that the labelers may not be experts, that way to proceed could fail to take real advantage of the knowledge of the labelers. In this paper, the use of candidate labeling for crowd learning is proposed, where the annotators may provide more than a single label per instance to try not to miss the real label. The main hypothesis is that, by allowing candidate labeling, knowledge can be extracted from the labelers more efficiently by than in the standard crowd learning scenario. Empirical evidence which supports that hypothesis is presented.
1.4LGMar 18, 2014
Similarity networks for classification: a case study in the Horse Colic problemLluís Belanche, Jerónimo Hernández
This paper develops a two-layer neural network in which the neuron model computes a user-defined similarity function between inputs and weights. The neuron transfer function is formed by composition of an adapted logistic function with the mean of the partial input-weight similarities. The resulting neuron model is capable of dealing directly with variables of potentially different nature (continuous, fuzzy, ordinal, categorical). There is also provision for missing values. The network is trained using a two-stage procedure very similar to that used to train a radial basis function (RBF) neural network. The network is compared to two types of RBF networks in a non-trivial dataset: the Horse Colic problem, taken as a case study and analyzed in detail.