Yuriy Dorn

Vladimir Burlakov, Alena Rybakina, Sergey Kudashev et al.

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has been proposed as a transformative approach to join-order optimization in database query processing, with recent frameworks such as AlphaJoin and HyperQO claiming to outperform traditional methods. However, the fact that these frameworks rely on learned cost models raises concerns related to generalizability and deployment readiness. This paper presents a comprehensive reproducibility study of these methods, revealing that they often fail to support the claimed performance gains when subjected to diverse workloads. Through an ablation study, we diagnose the root cause of this instability: while the MCTS search strategy is effective, the accompanying learned cost models suffer from severe out-of-distribution generalization errors. Addressing this, we propose a novel MCTS framework. Unlike prior methods that rely on unstable learned components, our approach utilizes the database standard internal cost model, augmented by a new Extreme UCT (Upper Confidence Bound applied to Trees) selection policy to navigate the search space more robustly. We benchmark our method against the original AlphaJoin and HyperQO, as well as industry-standard baselines including Dynamic Programming (DP) and Genetic Query Optimization (GEQO), using the well-known Join Order Benchmark (JOB) and the new JOB-Complex benchmark. The results demonstrate that our approach outperforms learned MCTS methods and achieves superiority over a SOTA query optimizer in complex join scenarios on real-world data. We release the full implementation and experimental artifacts to support further research.

Alexandra Khirianova, Ekaterina Solodneva, Andrey Pudovikov et al.

The optimization of bidding strategies for online advertising slot auctions presents a critical challenge across numerous digital marketplaces. A significant obstacle to the development, evaluation, and refinement of real-time autobidding algorithms is the scarcity of comprehensive datasets and standardized benchmarks. To address this deficiency, we present an auction benchmark encompassing the two most prevalent auction formats. We implement a series of robust baselines on a novel dataset, addressing the most salient Real-Time Bidding (RTB) problem domains: budget pacing uniformity and Cost Per Click (CPC) constraint optimization. This benchmark provides a user-friendly and intuitive framework for researchers and practitioners to develop and refine innovative autobidding algorithms, thereby facilitating advancements in the field of programmatic advertising. The implementation and additional resources can be accessed at the following repository (https://github.com/avito-tech/bat-autobidding-benchmark, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14794182).

Andrey Pudovikov, Alexandra Khirianova, Ekaterina Solodneva et al.

Advertisement auctions play a crucial role in revenue generation for e-commerce companies. To make the bidding procedure scalable to thousands of auctions, the automatic bidding (autobidding) algorithms are actively developed in the industry. Therefore, the fair and reproducible evaluation of autobidding algorithms is an important problem. We present a standardized and transparent evaluation protocol for comparing classical and reinforcement learning (RL) autobidding algorithms. We consider the most efficient autobidding algorithms from different classes, e.g., ones based on the controllers, RL, optimal formulas, etc., and benchmark them in the bidding environment. We utilize the most recent open-source environment developed in the industry, which accurately emulates the bidding process. Our work demonstrates the most promising use cases for the considered autobidding algorithms, highlights their surprising drawbacks, and evaluates them according to multiple metrics. We select the evaluation metrics that illustrate the performance of the autobidding algorithms, the corresponding costs, and track the budget pacing. Such a choice of metrics makes our results applicable to the broad range of platforms where autobidding is effective. The presented comparison results help practitioners to evaluate the candidate autobidding algorithms from different perspectives and select ones that are efficient according to their companies' targets.

Yuriy Dorn, Aleksandr Katrutsa, Ilgam Latypov et al.

In this study, we propose a new method for constructing UCB-type algorithms for stochastic multi-armed bandits based on general convex optimization methods with an inexact oracle. We derive the regret bounds corresponding to the convergence rates of the optimization methods. We propose a new algorithm Clipped-SGD-UCB and show, both theoretically and empirically, that in the case of symmetric noise in the reward, we can achieve an $O(\log T\sqrt{KT\log T})$ regret bound instead of $O\left (T^{\frac{1}{1+α}} K^{\fracα{1+α}} \right)$ for the case when the reward distribution satisfies $\mathbb{E}_{X \in D}[|X|^{1+α}] \leq σ^{1+α}$ ($α\in (0, 1])$, i.e. perform better than it is assumed by the general lower bound for bandits with heavy-tails. Moreover, the same bound holds even when the reward distribution does not have the expectation, that is, when $α<0$.

Yuriy Dorn, Aleksandr Katrutsa, Ilgam Latypov et al.

Bandit optimization usually refers to the class of online optimization problems with limited feedback, namely, a decision maker uses only the objective value at the current point to make a new decision and does not have access to the gradient of the objective function. While this name accurately captures the limitation in feedback, it is somehow misleading since it does not have any connection with the multi-armed bandits (MAB) problem class. We propose two new classes of problems: the functional multi-armed bandit problem (FMAB) and the best function identification problem. They are modifications of a multi-armed bandit problem and the best arm identification problem, respectively, where each arm represents an unknown black-box function. These problem classes are a surprisingly good fit for modeling real-world problems such as competitive LLM training. To solve the problems from these classes, we propose a new reduction scheme to construct UCB-type algorithms, namely, the F-LCB algorithm, based on algorithms for nonlinear optimization with known convergence rates. We provide the regret upper bounds for this reduction scheme based on the base algorithms' convergence rates. We add numerical experiments that demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme.

Ilgam Latypov, Alexandra Suvorikova, Alexey Kroshnin et al.

In many modern applications, a system must dynamically choose between several adaptive learning algorithms that are trained online. Examples include model selection in streaming environments, switching between trading strategies in finance, and orchestrating multiple contextual bandit or reinforcement learning agents. At each round, a learner must select one predictor among $K$ adaptive experts to make a prediction, while being able to update at most $M \le K$ of them under a fixed training budget. We address this problem in the \emph{stochastic setting} and introduce \algname{M-LCB}, a computationally efficient UCB-style meta-algorithm that provides \emph{anytime regret guarantees}. Its confidence intervals are built directly from realized losses, require no additional optimization, and seamlessly reflect the convergence properties of the underlying experts. If each expert achieves internal regret $\tilde O(T^α)$, then \algname{M-LCB} ensures overall regret bounded by $\tilde O\!\Bigl(\sqrt{\tfrac{KT}{M}} \;+\; (K/M)^{1-α}\,T^α\Bigr)$. To our knowledge, this is the first result establishing regret guarantees when multiple adaptive experts are trained simultaneously under per-round budget constraints. We illustrate the framework with two representative cases: (i) parametric models trained online with stochastic losses, and (ii) experts that are themselves multi-armed bandit algorithms. These examples highlight how \algname{M-LCB} extends the classical bandit paradigm to the more realistic scenario of coordinating stateful, self-learning experts under limited resources.

Anastasiia Soboleva, Andrey Pudovikov, Roman Snetkov et al.

Online advertising platforms often face a common challenge: the cold start problem. Insufficient behavioral data (clicks) makes accurate click-through rate (CTR) forecasting of new ads challenging. CTR for "old" items can also be significantly underestimated due to their early performance influencing their long-term behavior on the platform. The cold start problem has far-reaching implications for businesses, including missed long-term revenue opportunities. To mitigate this issue, we developed a UCB-like algorithm under multi-armed bandit (MAB) setting for positional-based model (PBM), specifically tailored to auction pay-per-click systems. Our proposed algorithm successfully combines theory and practice: we obtain theoretical upper estimates of budget regret, and conduct a series of experiments on synthetic and real-world data that confirm the applicability of the method on the real platform. In addition to increasing the platform's long-term profitability, we also propose a mechanism for maintaining short-term profits through controlled exploration and exploitation of items.

Yuriy Dorn, Nikita Kornilov, Nikolay Kutuzov et al.

The Implicitly Normalized Forecaster (INF) algorithm is considered to be an optimal solution for adversarial multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems. However, most of the existing complexity results for INF rely on restrictive assumptions, such as bounded rewards. Recently, a related algorithm was proposed that works for both adversarial and stochastic heavy-tailed MAB settings. However, this algorithm fails to fully exploit the available data. In this paper, we propose a new version of INF called the Implicitly Normalized Forecaster with clipping (INF-clip) for MAB problems with heavy-tailed reward distributions. We establish convergence results under mild assumptions on the rewards distribution and demonstrate that INF-clip is optimal for linear heavy-tailed stochastic MAB problems and works well for non-linear ones. Furthermore, we show that INF-clip outperforms the best-of-both-worlds algorithm in cases where it is difficult to distinguish between different arms.