Yunzhi Xue

Shuting Kang, Heng Guo, Lijun Zhang et al.

Critical scenario generation requires the ability of sampling critical combinations from the infinite parameter space in the logic scenario. Existing solutions aim to explore the correlation of action parameters in the initial scenario rather than action sequences. How to model action sequences so that one can further consider the effects of different action parameters in the scenario is the bottleneck of the problem. In this paper, we attack the problem by proposing the ECSAS framework. Specifically, we first propose a description language, BTScenario, allowing us to model action sequences of the scenarios. We then use reinforcement learning to search for combinations of critical action parameters. To increase efficiency, we further propose several optimizations, including action masking and replay buffer. We have implemented ECSAS, and experimental results show that it is more efficient than native approaches such as random and combination testing in various nontrivial scenarios.

Yukuan Yang, Xucheng Lu, Zhili Zhang et al.

Generating adversarial safety-critical scenarios is a pivotal method for testing autonomous driving systems, as it identifies potential weaknesses and enhances system robustness and reliability. However, existing approaches predominantly emphasize unrestricted collision scenarios, prompting non-player character (NPC) vehicles to attack the ego vehicle indiscriminately. These works overlook these scenarios' authenticity, rationality, and relevance, resulting in numerous extreme, contrived, and largely unrealistic collision events involving aggressive NPC vehicles. To rectify this issue, we propose a three-layer relative safety region model, which partitions the area based on danger levels and increases the likelihood of NPC vehicles entering relative boundary regions. This model directs NPC vehicles to engage in adversarial actions within relatively safe boundary regions, thereby augmenting the scenarios' authenticity. We introduce AuthSim, a comprehensive platform for generating authentic and effective safety-critical scenarios by integrating the three-layer relative safety region model with reinforcement learning. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to address the authenticity and effectiveness of autonomous driving system test scenarios comprehensively. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AuthSim outperforms existing methods in generating effective safety-critical scenarios. Notably, AuthSim achieves a 5.25% improvement in average cut-in distance and a 27.12% enhancement in average collision interval time, while maintaining higher efficiency in generating effective safety-critical scenarios compared to existing methods. This underscores its significant advantage in producing authentic scenarios over current methodologies.

Pengliang Ji, Li Ruan, Yunzhi Xue et al.

Owing to the merits of early safety and reliability guarantee, autonomous driving virtual testing has recently gains increasing attention compared with closed-loop testing in real scenarios. Although the availability and quality of autonomous driving datasets and toolsets are the premise to diagnose the autonomous driving system bottlenecks and improve the system performance, due to the diversity and privacy of the datasets and toolsets, collecting and featuring the perspective and quality of them become not only time-consuming but also increasingly challenging. This paper first proposes a Systematic Literature review approach for Autonomous driving tests (SLA), then presents an overview of existing publicly available datasets and toolsets from 2000 to 2020. Quantitative findings with the scenarios concerned, perspectives and trend inferences and suggestions with 35 automated driving test tool sets and 70 test data sets are also presented. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to perform such recent empirical survey on both the datasets and toolsets using a SLA based survey approach. Our multifaceted analyses and new findings not only reveal insights that we believe are useful for system designers, practitioners and users, but also can promote more researches on a systematic survey analysis in autonomous driving surveys on dataset and toolsets.