Swadhin Pradhan

h-index11
4papers
537citations

4 Papers

5.2LGJun 10
APEX: A Network-Native Time-Series Foundation Model for Forecasting and Anomaly Detection for Wireless Edge Operations

Swadhin Pradhan, Niloo Bahadori, Peiman Amini

Generic time-series foundation models transfer poorly to wireless network telemetry whose signals are bursty, zero-inflated, and coupled across protocol layers. We present APEX, a network-native, decoder-only transformer for forecasting enterprise AP telemetry, and evaluate it on DHCP degradation as a representative network task. APEX is pre-trained on 10-channel multivariate telemetry from ~4,500 production wireless networks (~100K AP time series, 34 metrics per AP), and is available as APEX-Large (269M, cloud) and APEX-Edge (10.5M, edge). On a 192-step (4-day) DHCP degradation benchmark, APEX-Large reduces MAE by 18% over the strongest foundation-model baseline (Toto) and 38% over SARIMA, with anomaly-detection F1 = 0.93, while APEX-Edge enables sub-second, privacy-preserving inference on AP-class edge hardware. These results suggest network-native pre-training is a practical foundation for proactive wireless operations.

5.7LGMar 13
PLUME: Building a Network-Native Foundation Model for Wireless Traces via Protocol-Aware Tokenization

Swadhin Pradhan, Shazal Irshad, Jerome Henry

Foundation models succeed when they learn in the native structure of a modality, whether morphology-respecting tokens in language or pixels in vision. Wireless packet traces deserve the same treatment: meaning emerges from layered headers, typed fields, timing gaps, and cross-packet state machines, not flat strings. We present Plume (Protocol Language Understanding Model for Exchanges), a compact 140M-parameter foundation model for 802.11 traces that learns from structured PDML dissections. A protocol-aware tokenizer splits along the dissector field tree, emits gap tokens for timing, and normalizes identifiers, yielding 6.2x shorter sequences than BPE with higher per token information density. Trained on a curated corpus, Plume achieves 74-97% next-packet token accuracy across five real-world failure categories and AUROC >= 0.99 for zero-shot anomaly detection. On the same prediction task, frontier LLMs (Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4) score comparably despite receiving identical protocol context, yet Plume does so with > 600x fewer parameters, fitting on a single GPU at effectively zero marginal cost vs. cloud API pricing, enabling on-prem, privacy-preserving root cause analysis.

6.7LGJun 5
Evidence-Grounded Ensemble Diagnosis of 802.11 Packet Captures: A Multi-Stage Pipeline with Deterministic Reliability Scoring

Jerome Henry, Swadhin Pradhan, Miroslav Popovic

Diagnosing 802.11 packet captures requires expert protocol knowledge, is slow, inconsistent across engineers, and unscalable. LLM-based approaches sound plausible but fabricate protocol events absent from captures (especially truncated traces), produce uncalibrated confidence scores, and suffer evaluation bias when golden references are co-produced by the model under test. We introduce PROBE (Protocol Reasoning Over evidence-Based Ensembles), a multi-stage pipeline addressing all three failures. It integrates (i) deterministic PCAP-to-text normalization with frame-level verifiability, (ii) multi-run, multi-candidate ensembles with optional cross-model second opinion and progressive obfuscation, (iii) a verdict-aware evidence framework treating absence of failure evidence as contributing evidence, and (iv) a fully deterministic composite reliability score from evidence validity, run-to-run stability, and cross-model agreement without LLM self-assessment. On 87 enterprise Wi-Fi captures (104 capture-reviewer pairs), single-pass LLM analysis raises weighted evidence F1 from 0.871 (expert baseline) to 0.912 but misses critical frames in 35% of cases. Naive ensemble voting drops below baseline (0.842) as majority voting amplifies conservative verdicts: 50% of confirmed failures are misclassified as 'no issue' or 'insufficient evidence.' Adding evidence-grounded reconciliation achieves 0.957 F1, a 96% auto-accept rate, and a worst-case floor above 0.70. LLM self-reported confidence clusters at 0.95 regardless of difficulty (71% report exactly 0.95), confirming it is uninformative. We also introduce a model-agnostic evaluation framework using per-field assertion matching, eliminating circular bias from model-co-produced golden references.

7.5HCMar 8
MIRO: Multi-radar Identity and Ranging for Occupational Safety

Tirthankar Halder, Argha Sen, Swadhin Pradhan et al.

Occupational exposure to airborne particulate matter (PM) poses a severe health risk in open industrial workspaces such as stonecutting yards. Conventional monitoring solutions such as wearable PM sensors and camera-based tracking are impractical due to discomfort, maintenance issues, and privacy concerns. We present MIRO, a privacy-preserving framework that integrates continuous PM sensing with a multi-radar millimeter-wave (mmWave) re-identification (re-ID) backbone. A distributed network of PM sensors captures localized pollutant concentrations, while spatially overlapping mmWave radars track and re-associate workers across viewpoints without relying on visual cues. To ensure identity consistency across radars, we introduce a GAN-based view adaptation network that compensates for azimuthal distortions in range-Doppler (RD) signatures, combined with correlation-based cross-radar matching. In controlled laboratory experiments, our system achieves a re-ID F1-score of 90.4% and a mean Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) of 0.70 for view adaptation accuracy. Field trials in rural stone-cutting yards further validate the system's robustness, demonstrating reliable worker-specific PM exposure estimation.