Quang-Hung Luu

Quang-Hung Luu, Huai Liu, Tsong Yueh Chen

While ChatGPT is a well-known artificial intelligence chatbot being used to answer human's questions, one may want to discover its potential in advancing software testing. We examine the capability of ChatGPT in advancing the intelligence of software testing through a case study on metamorphic testing (MT), a state-of-the-art software testing technique. We ask ChatGPT to generate candidates of metamorphic relations (MRs), which are basically necessary properties of the object program and which traditionally require human intelligence to identify. These MR candidates are then evaluated in terms of correctness by domain experts. We show that ChatGPT can be used to generate new correct MRs to test several software systems. Having said that, the majority of MR candidates are either defined vaguely or incorrect, especially for systems that have never been tested with MT. ChatGPT can be used to advance software testing intelligence by proposing MR candidates that can be later adopted for implementing tests; but human intelligence should still inevitably be involved to justify and rectify their correctness.

Yifan Zhang, Dave Towey, Matthew Pike et al.

Context: This paper provides an in-depth examination of the generation and evaluation of Metamorphic Relations (MRs) using GPT models developed by OpenAI, with a particular focus on the capabilities of GPT-4 in software testing environments. Objective: The aim is to examine the quality of MRs produced by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for a specific System Under Test (SUT) adopted from an earlier study, and to introduce and apply an improved set of evaluation criteria for a diverse range of SUTs. Method: The initial phase evaluates MRs generated by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 using criteria from a prior study, followed by an application of an enhanced evaluation framework on MRs created by GPT-4 for a diverse range of nine SUTs, varying from simple programs to complex systems incorporating AI/ML components. A custom-built GPT evaluator, alongside human evaluators, assessed the MRs, enabling a direct comparison between automated and human evaluation methods. Results: The study finds that GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5 in generating accurate and useful MRs. With the advanced evaluation criteria, GPT-4 demonstrates a significant ability to produce high-quality MRs across a wide range of SUTs, including complex systems incorporating AI/ML components. Conclusions: GPT-4 exhibits advanced capabilities in generating MRs suitable for various applications. The research underscores the growing potential of AI in software testing, particularly in the generation and evaluation of MRs, and points towards the complementarity of human and AI skills in this domain.

Linh Trinh, Quang-Hung Luu, Thai M. Nguyen et al.

Stress testing is an approach for evaluating the reliability of systems under extreme conditions which help reveal vulnerable scenarios that standard testing may overlook. Identifying such scenarios is of great importance in autonomous vehicles (AV) and other safety-critical systems. Since failure events are rare, naive random search approaches require a large number of vehicle operation hours to identify potential system failures. Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) is a method addressing this constraint by effectively exploring the failure trajectories of AV using a Markov decision process and employs reinforcement learning techniques to identify driving scenarios with high probability of failures. However, existing AST frameworks are able to handle only simple scenarios, such as one vehicle moving longitudinally on a single lane road which is not realistic and has a limited applicability. In this paper, we propose a novel AST framework to systematically explore corner cases of intelligent driving models that can result in safety concerns involving both longitudinal and lateral vehicle's movements. Specially, we develop a new reward function for Deep Reinforcement Learning to guide the AST in identifying crash scenarios based on the collision probability estimate between the AV under test (i.e., the ego vehicle) and the trajectory of other vehicles on the multi-lane roads. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we tested it with a complex driving model vehicle that can be controlled in both longitudinal and lateral directions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of our experimental results demonstrate that our framework outperforms the state-of-the-art AST scheme in identifying corner cases with complex driving maneuvers.