LGAug 30, 2024
Deep Neural Networks for Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After SurgeryYuhan Zheng, Jessie A Elliott, John V Reynolds et al.
Esophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality internationally, with high recurrence rates and poor survival even among patients treated with curative-intent surgery. Investigating relevant prognostic factors and predicting prognosis can enhance post-operative clinical decision-making and potentially improve patients' outcomes. In this work, we assessed prognostic factor identification and discriminative performances of three models for Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) using a large multicenter international dataset from ENSURE study. We first employed Cox Proportional Hazards (CoxPH) model to assess the impact of each feature on outcomes. Subsequently, we utilised CoxPH and two deep neural network (DNN)-based models, DeepSurv and DeepHit, to predict DFS and OS. The significant prognostic factors identified by our models were consistent with clinical literature, with post-operative pathologic features showing higher significance than clinical stage features. DeepSurv and DeepHit demonstrated comparable discriminative accuracy to CoxPH, with DeepSurv slightly outperforming in both DFS and OS prediction tasks, achieving C-index of 0.735 and 0.74, respectively. While these results suggested the potential of DNNs as prognostic tools for improving predictive accuracy and providing personalised guidance with respect to risk stratification, CoxPH still remains an adequately good prediction model, with the data used in this study.
CVDec 12, 2022
An Ensemble Method to Automatically Grade Diabetic Retinopathy with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography ImagesYuhan Zheng, Fuping Wu, Bartłomiej W. Papież
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes, and one of the major causes of vision impairment in the global population. As the early-stage manifestation of DR is usually very mild and hard to detect, an accurate diagnosis via eye-screening is clinically important to prevent vision loss at later stages. In this work, we propose an ensemble method to automatically grade DR using ultra-wide optical coherence tomography angiography (UW-OCTA) images available from Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis Challenge (DRAC) 2022. First, we adopt the state-of-the-art classification networks, i.e., ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and VGG, and train them to grade UW-OCTA images with different splits of the available dataset. Ultimately, we obtain 25 models, of which, the top 16 models are selected and ensembled to generate the final predictions. During the training process, we also investigate the multi-task learning strategy, and add an auxiliary classification task, the Image Quality Assessment, to improve the model performance. Our final ensemble model achieved a quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) of 0.9346 and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.9766 on the internal testing dataset, and the QWK of 0.839 and the AUC of 0.8978 on the DRAC challenge testing dataset.
LGFeb 23, 2025Code
AIRepr: An Analyst-Inspector Framework for Evaluating Reproducibility of LLMs in Data ScienceQiuhai Zeng, Claire Jin, Xinyue Wang et al.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate data analysis through executable code generation. Yet, data science tasks often admit multiple statistically valid solutions, e.g. different modeling strategies, making it critical to understand the reasoning behind analyses, not just their outcomes. While manual review of LLM-generated code can help ensure statistical soundness, it is labor-intensive and requires expertise. A more scalable approach is to evaluate the underlying workflows-the logical plans guiding code generation. However, it remains unclear how to assess whether an LLM-generated workflow supports reproducible implementations. To address this, we present AIRepr, an Analyst-Inspector framework for automatically evaluating and improving the reproducibility of LLM-generated data analysis workflows. Our framework is grounded in statistical principles and supports scalable, automated assessment. We introduce two novel reproducibility-enhancing prompting strategies and benchmark them against standard prompting across 15 analyst-inspector LLM pairs and 1,032 tasks from three public benchmarks. Our findings show that workflows with higher reproducibility also yield more accurate analyses, and that reproducibility-enhancing prompts substantially improve both metrics. This work provides a foundation for transparent, reliable, and efficient human-AI collaboration in data science. Our code is publicly available.