LGAug 7, 2023
Tractability of approximation by general shallow networksHrushikesh Mhaskar, Tong Mao
In this paper, we present a sharper version of the results in the paper Dimension independent bounds for general shallow networks; Neural Networks, \textbf{123} (2020), 142-152. Let $\mathbb{X}$ and $\mathbb{Y}$ be compact metric spaces. We consider approximation of functions of the form $ x\mapsto\int_{\mathbb{Y}} G( x, y)dτ( y)$, $ x\in\mathbb{X}$, by $G$-networks of the form $ x\mapsto \sum_{k=1}^n a_kG( x, y_k)$, $ y_1,\cdots, y_n\in\mathbb{Y}$, $a_1,\cdots, a_n\in\mathbb{R}$. Defining the dimensions of $\mathbb{X}$ and $\mathbb{Y}$ in terms of covering numbers, we obtain dimension independent bounds on the degree of approximation in terms of $n$, where also the constants involved are all dependent at most polynomially on the dimensions. Applications include approximation by power rectified linear unit networks, zonal function networks, certain radial basis function networks as well as the important problem of function extension to higher dimensional spaces.
LGMar 2, 2023
Encoding of data sets and algorithmsKatarina Doctor, Tong Mao, Hrushikesh Mhaskar
In many high-impact applications, it is important to ensure the quality of output of a machine learning algorithm as well as its reliability in comparison with the complexity of the algorithm used. In this paper, we have initiated a mathematically rigorous theory to decide which models (algorithms applied on data sets) are close to each other in terms of certain metrics, such as performance and the complexity level of the algorithm. This involves creating a grid on the hypothetical spaces of data sets and algorithms so as to identify a finite set of probability distributions from which the data sets are sampled and a finite set of algorithms. A given threshold metric acting on this grid will express the nearness (or statistical distance) from each algorithm and data set of interest to any given application. A technically difficult part of this project is to estimate the so-called metric entropy of a compact subset of functions of \textbf{infinitely many variables} that arise in the definition of these spaces.
LGFeb 23, 2025
Active Learning Classification from a Signal Separation PerspectiveHrushikesh Mhaskar, Ryan O'Dowd, Efstratios Tsoukanis
In machine learning, classification is usually seen as a function approximation problem, where the goal is to learn a function that maps input features to class labels. In this paper, we propose a novel clustering and classification framework inspired by the principles of signal separation. This approach enables efficient identification of class supports, even in the presence of overlapping distributions. We validate our method on real-world hyperspectral datasets Salinas and Indian Pines. The experimental results demonstrate that our method is competitive with the state of the art active learning algorithms by using a very small subset of data set as training points.
LGMay 6, 2023
Approximation by non-symmetric networks for cross-domain learningHrushikesh Mhaskar
For the past 30 years or so, machine learning has stimulated a great deal of research in the study of approximation capabilities (expressive power) of a multitude of processes, such as approximation by shallow or deep neural networks, radial basis function networks, and a variety of kernel based methods. Motivated by applications such as invariant learning, transfer learning, and synthetic aperture radar imaging, we initiate in this paper a general approach to study the approximation capabilities of kernel based networks using non-symmetric kernels. While singular value decomposition is a natural instinct to study such kernels, we consider a more general approach to include the use of a family of kernels, such as generalized translation networks (which include neural networks and translation invariant kernels as special cases) and rotated zonal function kernels. Naturally, unlike traditional kernel based approximation, we cannot require the kernels to be positive definite. In particular, we obtain estimates on the accuracy of uniform approximation of functions in a Sobolev class by ReLU$^r$ networks when $r$ is not necessarily an integer. Our general results apply to the approximation of functions with small smoothness compared to the dimension of the input space.
NAFeb 13, 2022
Local approximation of operatorsHrushikesh Mhaskar
Many applications, such as system identification, classification of time series, direct and inverse problems in partial differential equations, and uncertainty quantification lead to the question of approximation of a non-linear operator between metric spaces $\mathfrak{X}$ and $\mathfrak{Y}$. We study the problem of determining the degree of approximation of such operators on a compact subset $K_\mathfrak{X}\subset \mathfrak{X}$ using a finite amount of information. If $\mathcal{F}: K_\mathfrak{X}\to K_\mathfrak{Y}$, a well established strategy to approximate $\mathcal{F}(F)$ for some $F\in K_\mathfrak{X}$ is to encode $F$ (respectively, $\mathcal{F}(F)$) in terms of a finite number $d$ (repectively $m$) of real numbers. Together with appropriate reconstruction algorithms (decoders), the problem reduces to the approximation of $m$ functions on a compact subset of a high dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, equivalently, the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^d$ embedded in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$. The problem is challenging because $d$, $m$, as well as the complexity of the approximation on $\mathbb{S}^d$ are all large, and it is necessary to estimate the accuracy keeping track of the inter-dependence of all the approximations involved. In this paper, we establish constructive methods to do this efficiently; i.e., with the constants involved in the estimates on the approximation on $\mathbb{S}^d$ being $\mathcal{O}(d^{1/6})$. We study different smoothness classes for the operators, and also propose a method for approximation of $\mathcal{F}(F)$ using only information in a small neighborhood of $F$, resulting in an effective reduction in the number of parameters involved.
LGOct 4, 2021
A manifold learning approach for gesture recognition from micro-Doppler radar measurementsEric Mason, Hrushikesh Mhaskar, Adam Guo
A recent paper (Neural Networks, {\bf 132} (2020), 253-268) introduces a straightforward and simple kernel based approximation for manifold learning that does not require the knowledge of anything about the manifold, except for its dimension. In this paper, we examine how the pointwise error in approximation using least squares optimization based on similarly localized kernels depends upon the data characteristics and deteriorates as one goes away from the training data. The theory is presented with an abstract localized kernel, which can utilize any prior knowledge about the data being located on an unknown sub-manifold of a known manifold. We demonstrate the performance of our approach using a publicly available micro-Doppler data set, and investigate the use of different preprocessing measures, kernels, and manifold dimensions. Specifically, it is shown that the localized kernel introduced in the above mentioned paper when used with PCA components leads to a near-competitive performance to deep neural networks, and offers significant improvements in training speed and memory requirements. To demonstrate the fact that our methods are agnostic to the domain knowledge, we examine the classification problem in a simple video data set.
MLSep 29, 2021
Kernel distance measures for time series, random fields and other structured dataSrinjoy Das, Hrushikesh Mhaskar, Alexander Cloninger
This paper introduces kdiff, a novel kernel-based measure for estimating distances between instances of time series, random fields and other forms of structured data. This measure is based on the idea of matching distributions that only overlap over a portion of their region of support. Our proposed measure is inspired by MPdist which has been previously proposed for such datasets and is constructed using Euclidean metrics, whereas kdiff is constructed using non-linear kernel distances. Also, kdiff accounts for both self and cross similarities across the instances and is defined using a lower quantile of the distance distribution. Comparing the cross similarity to self similarity allows for measures of similarity that are more robust to noise and partial occlusions of the relevant signals. Our proposed measure kdiff is a more general form of the well known kernel-based Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) distance estimated over the embeddings. Some theoretical results are provided for separability conditions using kdiff as a distance measure for clustering and classification problems where the embedding distributions can be modeled as two component mixtures. Applications are demonstrated for clustering of synthetic and real-life time series and image data, and the performance of kdiff is compared to competing distance measures for clustering.
LGAug 3, 2020
Cautious Active ClusteringAlexander Cloninger, Hrushikesh Mhaskar
We consider the problem of classification of points sampled from an unknown probability measure on a Euclidean space. We study the question of querying the class label at a very small number of judiciously chosen points so as to be able to attach the appropriate class label to every point in the set. Our approach is to consider the unknown probability measure as a convex combination of the conditional probabilities for each class. Our technique involves the use of a highly localized kernel constructed from Hermite polynomials, in order to create a hierarchical estimate of the supports of the constituent probability measures. We do not need to make any assumptions on the nature of any of the probability measures nor know in advance the number of classes involved. We give theoretical guarantees measured by the $F$-score for our classification scheme. Examples include classification in hyper-spectral images and MNIST classification.
LGAug 1, 2019
A direct approach for function approximation on data defined manifoldsHrushikesh Mhaskar
In much of the literature on function approximation by deep networks, the function is assumed to be defined on some known domain, such as a cube or a sphere. In practice, the data might not be dense on these domains, and therefore, the approximation theory results are observed to be too conservative. In manifold learning, one assumes instead that the data is sampled from an unknown manifold; i.e., the manifold is defined by the data itself. Function approximation on this unknown manifold is then a two stage procedure: first, one approximates the Laplace-Beltrami operator (and its eigen-decomposition) on this manifold using a graph Laplacian, and next, approximates the target function using the eigen-functions. Alternatively, one estimates first some atlas on the manifold and then uses local approximation techniques based on the local coordinate charts. In this paper, we propose a more direct approach to function approximation on \emph{unknown}, data defined manifolds without computing the eigen-decomposition of some operator or an atlas for the manifold, and without any kind of training in the classical sense. Our constructions are universal; i.e., do not require the knowledge of any prior on the target function other than continuity on the manifold. We estimate the degree of approximation. For smooth functions, the estimates do not suffer from the so-called saturation phenomenon. We demonstrate via a property called good propagation of errors how the results can be lifted for function approximation using deep networks where each channel evaluates a Gaussian network on a possibly unknown manifold.
LGFeb 17, 2018
An analysis of training and generalization errors in shallow and deep networksHrushikesh Mhaskar, Tomaso Poggio
This paper is motivated by an open problem around deep networks, namely, the apparent absence of over-fitting despite large over-parametrization which allows perfect fitting of the training data. In this paper, we analyze this phenomenon in the case of regression problems when each unit evaluates a periodic activation function. We argue that the minimal expected value of the square loss is inappropriate to measure the generalization error in approximation of compositional functions in order to take full advantage of the compositional structure. Instead, we measure the generalization error in the sense of maximum loss, and sometimes, as a pointwise error. We give estimates on exactly how many parameters ensure both zero training error as well as a good generalization error. We prove that a solution of a regularization problem is guaranteed to yield a good training error as well as a good generalization error and estimate how much error to expect at which test data.
LGDec 30, 2017
Theory of Deep Learning III: explaining the non-overfitting puzzleTomaso Poggio, Kenji Kawaguchi, Qianli Liao et al.
A main puzzle of deep networks revolves around the absence of overfitting despite large overparametrization and despite the large capacity demonstrated by zero training error on randomly labeled data. In this note, we show that the dynamics associated to gradient descent minimization of nonlinear networks is topologically equivalent, near the asymptotically stable minima of the empirical error, to linear gradient system in a quadratic potential with a degenerate (for square loss) or almost degenerate (for logistic or crossentropy loss) Hessian. The proposition depends on the qualitative theory of dynamical systems and is supported by numerical results. Our main propositions extend to deep nonlinear networks two properties of gradient descent for linear networks, that have been recently established (1) to be key to their generalization properties: 1. Gradient descent enforces a form of implicit regularization controlled by the number of iterations, and asymptotically converges to the minimum norm solution for appropriate initial conditions of gradient descent. This implies that there is usually an optimum early stopping that avoids overfitting of the loss. This property, valid for the square loss and many other loss functions, is relevant especially for regression. 2. For classification, the asymptotic convergence to the minimum norm solution implies convergence to the maximum margin solution which guarantees good classification error for "low noise" datasets. This property holds for loss functions such as the logistic and cross-entropy loss independently of the initial conditions. The robustness to overparametrization has suggestive implications for the robustness of the architecture of deep convolutional networks with respect to the curse of dimensionality.
LGNov 2, 2016
Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a ReviewTomaso Poggio, Hrushikesh Mhaskar, Lorenzo Rosasco et al.
The paper characterizes classes of functions for which deep learning can be exponentially better than shallow learning. Deep convolutional networks are a special case of these conditions, though weight sharing is not the main reason for their exponential advantage.
LGAug 10, 2016
Deep vs. shallow networks : An approximation theory perspectiveHrushikesh Mhaskar, Tomaso Poggio
The paper briefy reviews several recent results on hierarchical architectures for learning from examples, that may formally explain the conditions under which Deep Convolutional Neural Networks perform much better in function approximation problems than shallow, one-hidden layer architectures. The paper announces new results for a non-smooth activation function - the ReLU function - used in present-day neural networks, as well as for the Gaussian networks. We propose a new definition of relative dimension to encapsulate different notions of sparsity of a function class that can possibly be exploited by deep networks but not by shallow ones to drastically reduce the complexity required for approximation and learning.
LGMar 3, 2016
Learning Functions: When Is Deep Better Than ShallowHrushikesh Mhaskar, Qianli Liao, Tomaso Poggio
While the universal approximation property holds both for hierarchical and shallow networks, we prove that deep (hierarchical) networks can approximate the class of compositional functions with the same accuracy as shallow networks but with exponentially lower number of training parameters as well as VC-dimension. This theorem settles an old conjecture by Bengio on the role of depth in networks. We then define a general class of scalable, shift-invariant algorithms to show a simple and natural set of requirements that justify deep convolutional networks.