Nimrod Harel

Nimrod Harel, Uri Obolski, Ran Gilad-Bachrach

The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of machine learning-driven technologies have underscored the practical and ethical need for creating interpretable artificial intelligence systems. Feature importance, a method that assigns scores to the contribution of individual features on prediction outcomes, seeks to bridge this gap as a tool for enhancing human comprehension of these systems. Feature importance serves as an explanation of predictions in diverse contexts, whether by providing a global interpretation of a phenomenon across the entire dataset or by offering a localized explanation for the outcome of a specific data point. Furthermore, feature importance is being used both for explaining models and for identifying plausible causal relations in the data, independently from the model. However, it is worth noting that these various contexts have traditionally been explored in isolation, with limited theoretical foundations. This paper presents an axiomatic framework designed to establish coherent relationships among the different contexts of feature importance scores. Notably, our work unveils a surprising conclusion: when we combine the proposed properties with those previously outlined in the literature, we demonstrate the existence of an inconsistency. This inconsistency highlights that certain essential properties of feature importance scores cannot coexist harmoniously within a single framework.

Yuval Grinberg, Nimrod Harel, Jacob Goldberger et al.

Falsely annotated samples, also known as noisy labels, can significantly harm the performance of deep learning models. Two main approaches for learning with noisy labels are global noise estimation and data filtering. Global noise estimation approximates the noise across the entire dataset using a noise transition matrix, but it can unnecessarily adjust correct labels, leaving room for local improvements. Data filtering, on the other hand, discards potentially noisy samples but risks losing valuable data. Our method identifies potentially noisy samples based on their loss distribution. We then apply a selection process to separate noisy and clean samples and learn a noise transition matrix to correct the loss for noisy samples while leaving the clean data unaffected, thereby improving the training process. Our approach ensures robust learning and enhanced model performance by preserving valuable information from noisy samples and refining the correction process. We applied our method to standard image datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) and a biological scRNA-seq cell-type annotation dataset. We observed a significant improvement in model accuracy and robustness compared to traditional methods.