Xingyu Shen

Yujia Qin, Shengding Hu, Yankai Lin et al. · tsinghua

Humans possess an extraordinary ability to create and utilize tools, allowing them to overcome physical limitations and explore new frontiers. With the advent of foundation models, AI systems have the potential to be equally adept in tool use as humans. This paradigm, i.e., tool learning with foundation models, combines the strengths of specialized tools and foundation models to achieve enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and automation in problem-solving. Despite its immense potential, there is still a lack of a comprehensive understanding of key challenges, opportunities, and future endeavors in this field. To this end, we present a systematic investigation of tool learning in this paper. We first introduce the background of tool learning, including its cognitive origins, the paradigm shift of foundation models, and the complementary roles of tools and models. Then we recapitulate existing tool learning research into tool-augmented and tool-oriented learning. We formulate a general tool learning framework: starting from understanding the user instruction, models should learn to decompose a complex task into several subtasks, dynamically adjust their plan through reasoning, and effectively conquer each sub-task by selecting appropriate tools. We also discuss how to train models for improved tool-use capabilities and facilitate the generalization in tool learning. Considering the lack of a systematic tool learning evaluation in prior works, we experiment with 18 representative tools and show the potential of current foundation models in skillfully utilizing tools. Finally, we discuss several open problems that require further investigation for tool learning. In general, we hope this paper could inspire future research in integrating tools with foundation models.

Chen Zhang, Yuxuan Lai, Yansong Feng et al. · pku

Although many large-scale knowledge bases (KBs) claim to contain multilingual information, their support for many non-English languages is often incomplete. This incompleteness gives birth to the task of cross-lingual question answering over knowledge base (xKBQA), which aims to answer questions in languages different from that of the provided KB. One of the major challenges facing xKBQA is the high cost of data annotation, leading to limited resources available for further exploration. Another challenge is mapping KB schemas and natural language expressions in the questions under cross-lingual settings. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for xKBQA in a reading comprehension paradigm. We convert KB subgraphs into passages to narrow the gap between KB schemas and questions, which enables our model to benefit from recent advances in multilingual pre-trained language models (MPLMs) and cross-lingual machine reading comprehension (xMRC). Specifically, we use MPLMs, with considerable knowledge of cross-lingual mappings, for cross-lingual reading comprehension. Existing high-quality xMRC datasets can be further utilized to finetune our model, greatly alleviating the data scarcity issue in xKBQA. Extensive experiments on two xKBQA datasets in 12 languages show that our approach outperforms various baselines and achieves strong few-shot and zero-shot performance. Our dataset and code are released for further research.

Simiao Ren, Xingyu Shen, Yuchen Zhou et al.

A claim has been circulating on social media and practitioner forums that Chinese prompts are more token-efficient than English for LLM coding tasks, potentially reducing costs by up to 40\%. This claim has influenced developers to consider switching to Chinese for ``vibe coding'' to save on API costs. In this paper, we conduct a rigorous empirical study using SWE-bench Lite, a benchmark of software engineering tasks, to evaluate whether this claim of Chinese token efficiency holds up to scrutiny. Our results reveal three key findings: First, the efficiency advantage of Chinese is not observed. Second, token cost varies by model architecture in ways that defy simple assumptions: while MiniMax-2.7 shows 1.28x higher token costs for Chinese, GLM-5 actually consumes fewer tokens with Chinese prompts. Third, and most importantly, we found that the success rate when prompting in Chinese is generally lower than in English across all models we tested. We also measure cost efficiency as expected cost per successful task -- jointly accounting for token consumption and task resolution rate. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence rather than a definitive conclusion, given the limited number of models evaluated and the narrow set of benchmarks tested due to resource constraints; they indicate that language effects on token cost are model-dependent, and that practitioners should not expect cost savings or performance gains just by switching their prompt language to Chinese.