Jacob Huckelberry

h-index2
2papers
5citations

2 Papers

5.8CRNov 11, 2024
TinyML Security: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Resource-Constrained Machine Learning Systems

Jacob Huckelberry, Yuke Zhang, Allison Sansone et al.

Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) systems, which enable machine learning inference on highly resource-constrained devices, are transforming edge computing but encounter unique security challenges. These devices, restricted by RAM and CPU capabilities two to three orders of magnitude smaller than conventional systems, make traditional software and hardware security solutions impractical. The physical accessibility of these devices exacerbates their susceptibility to side-channel attacks and information leakage. Additionally, TinyML models pose security risks, with weights potentially encoding sensitive data and query interfaces that can be exploited. This paper offers the first thorough survey of TinyML security threats. We present a device taxonomy that differentiates between IoT, EdgeML, and TinyML, highlighting vulnerabilities unique to TinyML. We list various attack vectors, assess their threat levels using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, and evaluate both existing and possible defenses. Our analysis identifies where traditional security measures are adequate and where solutions tailored to TinyML are essential. Our results underscore the pressing need for specialized security solutions in TinyML to ensure robust and secure edge computing applications. We aim to inform the research community and inspire innovative approaches to protecting this rapidly evolving and critical field.

4.0CRJun 12
Breaking TinyML: Why Quantized Neural Networks Need Domain-Specific Security Analysis

Jacob Huckelberry, Andrea Mattia Garavagno, Yuke Zhang et al.

Most TinyML hardware accelerators focus on supporting Quantized Neural Networks (QNNs) to meet stringent constraints on power consumption and size. Despite this, the security aspects of quantization within TinyML hardware remain largely unexplored. Although previous studies indicate that QNNs demonstrate similar or enhanced robustness when compared to full-precision Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) against typical evasion attacks, no attack strategies tailored specifically for TinyML hardware have been proposed yet. This paper addresses this shortfall by demonstrating how a two-step attack pipeline can surpass the current state-of-the-art in the QNN context and shows the need for more hardware-aware security research.