Meghan R. Hutch

Adrienne Kline, Hanyin Wang, Yikuan Li et al.

As machine learning and artificial intelligence are more frequently being leveraged to tackle problems in the health sector, there has been increased interest in utilizing them in clinical decision-support. This has historically been the case in single modal data such as electronic health record data. Attempts to improve prediction and resemble the multimodal nature of clinical expert decision-making this has been met in the computational field of machine learning by a fusion of disparate data. This review was conducted to summarize this field and identify topics ripe for future research. We conducted this review in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for Scoping Reviews to characterize multi-modal data fusion in health. We used a combination of content analysis and literature searches to establish search strings and databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEEXplore from 2011 to 2021. A final set of 125 articles were included in the analysis. The most common health areas utilizing multi-modal methods were neurology and oncology. However, there exist a wide breadth of current applications. The most common form of information fusion was early fusion. Notably, there was an improvement in predictive performance performing heterogeneous data fusion. Lacking from the papers were clear clinical deployment strategies and pursuit of FDA-approved tools. These findings provide a map of the current literature on multimodal data fusion as applied to health diagnosis/prognosis problems. Multi-modal machine learning, while more robust in its estimations over unimodal methods, has drawbacks in its scalability and the time-consuming nature of information concatenation.

Hanyin Wang, Meghan R. Hutch, Yikuan Li et al.

Over 12 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered at the time of writing. However, public perceptions of vaccines have been complex. We analyzed COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets to understand the evolving perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines. We finetuned a deep learning classifier using a state-of-the-art model, XLNet, to detect each tweet's sentiment automatically. We employed validated methods to extract the users' race or ethnicity, gender, age, and geographical locations from user profiles. Incorporating multiple data sources, we assessed the sentiment patterns among subpopulations and juxtaposed them against vaccine uptake data to unravel their interactive patterns. 11,211,672 COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets corresponding to 2,203,681 users over two years were analyzed. The finetuned model for sentiment classification yielded an accuracy of 0.92 on testing set. Users from various demographic groups demonstrated distinct patterns in sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccines. User sentiments became more positive over time, upon which we observed subsequent upswing in the population-level vaccine uptake. Surrounding dates where positive sentiments crest, we detected encouraging news or events regarding vaccine development and distribution. Positive sentiments in pregnancy-related tweets demonstrated a delayed pattern compared with trends in general population, with postponed vaccine uptake trends. Distinctive patterns across subpopulations suggest the need of tailored strategies. Global news and events profoundly involved in shaping users' thoughts on social media. Populations with additional concerns, such as pregnancy, demonstrated more substantial hesitancy since lack of timely recommendations. Feature analysis revealed hesitancies of various subpopulations stemmed from clinical trial logics, risks and complications, and urgency of scientific evidence.