Andrea Bonfanti

Andrea Bonfanti, Roberto Santana, Marco Ellero et al.

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are Neural Network architectures trained to emulate solutions of differential equations without the necessity of solution data. They are currently ubiquitous in the scientific literature due to their flexible and promising settings. However, very little of the available research provides practical studies that aim for a better quantitative understanding of such architecture and its functioning. In this paper, we perform an empirical analysis of the behavior of PINN predictions outside their training domain. The primary goal is to investigate the scenarios in which a PINN can provide consistent predictions outside the training area. Thereinafter, we assess whether the algorithmic setup of PINNs can influence their potential for generalization and showcase the respective effect on the prediction. The results obtained in this study returns insightful and at times counterintuitive perspectives which can be highly relevant for architectures which combines PINNs with domain decomposition and/or adaptive training strategies.

Andrea Bonfanti, Giuseppe Bruno, Cristina Cipriani

The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) viewpoint is widely employed to analyze the training dynamics of overparameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, unlike the case of linear Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), we show how the NTK perspective falls short in the nonlinear scenario. Specifically, we establish that the NTK yields a random matrix at initialization that is not constant during training, contrary to conventional belief. Another significant difference from the linear regime is that, even in the idealistic infinite-width limit, the Hessian does not vanish and hence it cannot be disregarded during training. This motivates the adoption of second-order optimization methods. We explore the convergence guarantees of such methods in both linear and nonlinear cases, addressing challenges such as spectral bias and slow convergence. Every theoretical result is supported by numerical examples with both linear and nonlinear PDEs, and we highlight the benefits of second-order methods in benchmark test cases.