Barbara Bodinier

Gilles Wainrib, Barbara Bodinier, Haitem Dakhli et al.

Recent work has questioned whether large language models (LLMs) can perform genuine in-context learning (ICL) for scientific experimental design, with prior studies suggesting that LLM-based agents exhibit no sensitivity to experimental feedback. We shed new light on this question by carrying out 800 independently replicated experiments on iterative perturbation discovery in Cell Painting high-content screening. We compare an LLM agent that iteratively updates its hypotheses using experimental feedback to a zero-shot baseline that relies solely on pretraining knowledge retrieval. Access to feedback yields a $+53.4\%$ increase in discoveries per feature on average ($p = 0.003$). To test whether this improvement arises from genuine feedback-driven learning rather than prompt-induced recall of pretraining knowledge, we introduce a random feedback control in which hit/miss labels are permuted. Under this control, the performance gain disappears, indicating that the observed improvement depends on the structure of the feedback signal ($+13.0$ hits, $p = 0.003$). We further examine how model capability affects feedback utilization. Upgrading from Claude Sonnet 4.5 to 4.6 reduces gene hallucination rates from ${\sim}33\%$--$45\%$ to ${\sim}3$--$9\%$, converting a non-significant ICL effect ($+0.8$, $p = 0.32$) into a large and highly significant improvement ($+11.0$, $p=0.003$) for the best ICL strategy. These results suggest that effective in-context learning from experimental feedback emerges only once models reach a sufficient capability threshold.

Barbara Bodinier, Gaetan Dissez, Lucile Ter-Minassian et al.

High-throughput preclinical perturbation screens, where the effects of genetic, chemical, or environmental perturbations are systematically tested on disease models, hold significant promise for machine learning-enhanced drug discovery due to their scale and causal nature. Predictive models trained on such datasets can be used to (i) infer perturbation response for previously untested disease models, and (ii) characterise the biological context that affects perturbation response. Existing predictive models suffer from limited reproducibility, generalisability and interpretability. To address these issues, we introduce a framework of Layered Ensemble of Autoencoders and Predictors (LEAP), a general and flexible ensemble strategy to aggregate predictions from multiple regressors trained using diverse gene expression representation models. LEAP consistently improves prediction performances in unscreened cell lines across modelling strategies. In particular, LEAP applied to perturbation-specific LASSO regressors (PS-LASSO) provides a favorable balance between near state-of-the-art performance and low computation time. We also propose an interpretability approach combining model distillation and stability selection to identify important biological pathways for perturbation response prediction in LEAP. Our models have the potential to accelerate the drug discovery pipeline by guiding the prioritisation of preclinical experiments and providing insights into the biological mechanisms involved in perturbation response. The code and datasets used in this work are publicly available.