Teodoro Baldazzi

Teodoro Baldazzi, Luigi Bellomarini, Stefano Ceri et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) exploit fine-tuning as a technique to adapt to diverse goals, thanks to task-specific training data. Task specificity should go hand in hand with domain orientation, that is, the specialization of an LLM to accurately address the tasks of a given realm of interest. However, models are usually fine-tuned over publicly available data or, at most, over ground data from databases, ignoring business-level definitions and domain experience. On the other hand, Enterprise Knowledge Graphs (EKGs) are able to capture and augment such domain knowledge via ontological reasoning. With the goal of combining LLM flexibility with the domain orientation of EKGs, we propose a novel neurosymbolic architecture that leverages the power of ontological reasoning to build task- and domain-specific corpora for LLM fine-tuning.

Teodoro Baldazzi, Luigi Bellomarini, Marco Favorito et al.

Recent years witnessed a rising interest towards Datalog-based ontological reasoning systems, both in academia and industry. These systems adopt languages, often shared under the collective name of Datalog$+/-$, that extend Datalog with the essential feature of existential quantification, while introducing syntactic limitations to sustain reasoning decidability and achieve a good trade-off between expressive power and computational complexity. From an implementation perspective, modern reasoners borrow the vast experience of the database community in developing streaming-based data processing systems, such as volcano-iterator architectures, that sustain a limited memory footprint and good scalability. In this paper, we focus on two extremely promising, expressive, and tractable languages, namely, Shy and Warded Datalog$+/-$. We leverage their theoretical underpinnings to introduce novel reasoning techniques, technically, "chase variants", that are particularly fit for efficient reasoning in streaming-based architectures. We then implement them in Vadalog, our reference streaming-based engine, to efficiently solve ontological reasoning tasks over real-world settings.

Teodoro Baldazzi, Luigi Bellomarini, Andrea Coletta et al.

Decision-making in real-world settings rarely follows a fixed script. Instead, it unfolds as a dynamic reasoning process in which the appropriate course of action evolves as new context and data become available. Traditional Business Process Management systems provide rigor, determinism, and auditability, yet they generally struggle to adapt their execution at runtime. Conversely, agentic systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) bring flexibility to decision-making, but they are inherently opaque, often unreliable, and suffer from significant scalability constraints when operating over large datasets. To combine these complementary paradigms, we introduce VADAOrchestra, a neurosymbolic framework that models complex workflows as evolving reasoning processes. The framework adopts a hybrid approach: given a user query and a collection of data sources, an LLM-based orchestrator incrementally plans and adapts the workflow. This is encoded as a logic program in a fragment of Datalog+/- where predicates correspond to tool invocations and rules represent both predefined domain dependencies and logic constructs synthesized on demand to manipulate intermediate results. All logical inference tasks are then executed by a state-of-the-art Datalog+/- symbolic engine. This approach provides a verifiable reasoning trace, supporting the auditability and reproducibility of the entire process. Furthermore, by decoupling high-level orchestration from symbolic inference, it addresses scalability concerns, enabling complex reasoning over large datasets through targeted data querying. We evaluate VADAOrchestra on real-world financial use cases, demonstrating faithfulness, scalability, and explainability compared to standard agentic architectures.

Teodoro Baldazzi, Luigi Bellomarini, Marco Favorito et al.

Datalog^E is the extension of Datalog with existential quantification. While its high expressive power, underpinned by a simple syntax and the support for full recursion, renders it particularly suitable for modern applications on knowledge graphs, query answering (QA) over such language is known to be undecidable in general. For this reason, different fragments have emerged, introducing syntactic limitations to Datalog^E that strike a balance between its expressive power and the computational complexity of QA, to achieve decidability. In this short paper, we focus on two promising tractable candidates, namely Shy and Warded Datalog+/-. Reacting to an explicit interest from the community, we shed light on the relationship between these fragments. Moreover, we carry out an experimental analysis of the systems implementing Shy and Warded, respectively DLV^E and Vadalog.

Teodoro Baldazzi, Luigi Bellomarini, Emanuel Sallinger et al.

Recent years have seen increasing popularity of logic-based reasoning systems, with research and industrial interest as well as many flourishing applications in the area of Knowledge Graphs. Despite that, one can observe a substantial lack of specific tools able to generate nontrivial reasoning settings and benchmark scenarios. As a consequence, evaluating, analysing and comparing reasoning systems is a complex task, especially when they embody sophisticated optimizations and execution techniques that leverage the theoretical underpinnings of the adopted logic fragment. In this paper, we aim at filling this gap by introducing iWarded, a system that can generate very large, complex, realistic reasoning settings to be used for the benchmarking of logic-based reasoning systems adopting Datalog+/-, a family of extensions of Datalog that has seen a resurgence in the last few years. In particular, iWarded generates reasoning settings for Warded Datalog+/-, a language with a very good tradeoff between computational complexity and expressive power. In the paper, we present the iWarded system and a set of novel theoretical results adopted to generate effective scenarios. As Datalog-based languages are of general interest and see increasing adoption, we believe that iWarded is a step forward in the empirical evaluation of current and future systems.