Hongjun Liu

CL
h-index33
4papers
123citations
Novelty26%
AI Score34

4 Papers

15.1CLNov 16, 2023Code
DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Long and Specialized Documents

Yilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Hongjun Liu et al.

Recent LLMs have demonstrated remarkable performance in solving exam-like math word problems. However, the degree to which these numerical reasoning skills are effective in real-world scenarios, particularly in expert domains, is still largely unexplored. This paper introduces DocMath-Eval, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the numerical reasoning capabilities of LLMs in the context of understanding and analyzing specialized documents containing both text and tables. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 48 LLMs with Chain-of-Thought and Program-of-Thought prompting methods, aiming to comprehensively assess the capabilities and limitations of existing LLMs in DocMath-Eval. We found that even the current best-performing system (i.e., GPT-4o) still significantly lags behind human experts in solving complex numerical reasoning problems grounded in long contexts. We believe that DocMath-Eval can serve as a valuable benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in solving challenging numerical reasoning problems within expert domains.

13.6CLNov 16, 2023Code
FinanceMath: Knowledge-Intensive Math Reasoning in Finance Domains

Yilun Zhao, Hongjun Liu, Yitao Long et al.

We introduce FinanceMath, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in solving knowledge-intensive math reasoning problems. Compared to prior works, this study features three core advancements. First, FinanceMath includes 1,200 problems with a hybrid of textual and tabular content. These problems require college-level knowledge in the finance domain for effective resolution. Second, we provide expert-annotated, detailed solution references in Python program format, ensuring a high-quality benchmark for LLM assessment. We also construct a finance-domain knowledge bank and investigate various knowledge integration strategies. Finally, we evaluate a wide spectrum of 44 LLMs with both Chain-of-Thought and Program-of-Thought prompting methods. Our experimental results reveal that the current best-performing system (i.e., GPT-4o) achieves only 60.9% accuracy using CoT prompting, leaving substantial room for improvement. Moreover, while augmenting LLMs with external knowledge can improve model performance (e.g., from 47.5% to 54.5% for Gemini-1.5-Pro), their accuracy remains significantly lower than the estimated human expert performance of 92%. We believe that FinanceMath can advance future research in the area of domain-specific knowledge retrieval and integration, particularly within the context of solving reasoning-intensive tasks.

17.5CLNov 8, 2024Code
FinDVer: Explainable Claim Verification over Long and Hybrid-Content Financial Documents

Yilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Yuru Jiang et al.

We introduce FinDVer, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the explainable claim verification capabilities of LLMs in the context of understanding and analyzing long, hybrid-content financial documents. FinDVer contains 2,400 expert-annotated examples, divided into three subsets: information extraction, numerical reasoning, and knowledge-intensive reasoning, each addressing common scenarios encountered in real-world financial contexts. We assess a broad spectrum of LLMs under long-context and RAG settings. Our results show that even the current best-performing system, GPT-4o, still lags behind human experts. We further provide in-depth analysis on long-context and RAG setting, Chain-of-Thought reasoning, and model reasoning errors, offering insights to drive future advancements. We believe that FinDVer can serve as a valuable benchmark for evaluating LLMs in claim verification over complex, expert-domain documents.

3.8CRNov 9, 2021
Cryptanalyze and design strong S-Box using 2D chaotic map and apply to irreversible key expansion

Hongjun Liu, Xingyuan Wang

Cryptanalysis result of key expansion algorithms in AES and SM4 revealed that, (1) there exist weaknesses in their S-Boxes, and (2) the round key expansion algorithm is reversible, i.e., the initial key can be recovered from any round key, which may be an exploitable weakness by attacker. To solve these problems, first we constructed a non-degenerate 2D exponential hyper chaotic map (2D-ECM), derived the recursion formula to calculate the number of S-Boxes that satisfied three conditions, and designed a strong S-Box construction algorithm without weakness. Then based on 2D-ECM and S-Box, we designed an irreversible key expansion algorithm, to transform the initial key into independent round keys, to make the initial key can not be recovered from any round key. Security and statistical analysis demonstrated the flexible and effectiveness of the proposed irreversible key expansion algorithm.