Amaury Gouverneur

Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodríguez-Gálvez, Tobias J. Oechtering et al.

In this work, we study the performance of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for Contextual Bandit problems based on the framework introduced by Neu et al. and their concept of lifted information ratio. First, we prove a comprehensive bound on the Thompson Sampling expected cumulative regret that depends on the mutual information of the environment parameters and the history. Then, we introduce new bounds on the lifted information ratio that hold for sub-Gaussian rewards, thus generalizing the results from Neu et al. which analysis requires binary rewards. Finally, we provide explicit regret bounds for the special cases of unstructured bounded contextual bandits, structured bounded contextual bandits with Laplace likelihood, structured Bernoulli bandits, and bounded linear contextual bandits.

Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodríguez-Gálvez, Tobias J. Oechtering et al.

Building on the framework introduced by Xu and Raginksy [1] for supervised learning problems, we study the best achievable performance for model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning problems. With this purpose, we define minimum Bayesian regret (MBR) as the difference between the maximum expected cumulative reward obtainable either by learning from the collected data or by knowing the environment and its dynamics. We specialize this definition to reinforcement learning problems modeled as Markov decision processes (MDPs) whose kernel parameters are unknown to the agent and whose uncertainty is expressed by a prior distribution. One method for deriving upper bounds on the MBR is presented and specific bounds based on the relative entropy and the Wasserstein distance are given. We then focus on two particular cases of MDPs, the multi-armed bandit problem (MAB) and the online optimization with partial feedback problem. For the latter problem, we show that our bounds can recover from below the current information-theoretic bounds by Russo and Van Roy [2].

Raghav Bongole, Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodríguez-Gálvez et al.

We study agents acting in an unknown environment where the agent's goal is to find a robust policy. We consider robust policies as policies that achieve high cumulative rewards for all possible environments. To this end, we consider agents minimizing the maximum regret over different environment parameters, leading to the study of minimax regret. This research focuses on deriving information-theoretic bounds for minimax regret in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with a finite time horizon. Building on concepts from supervised learning, such as minimum excess risk (MER) and minimax excess risk, we use recent bounds on the Bayesian regret to derive minimax regret bounds. Specifically, we establish minimax theorems and use bounds on the Bayesian regret to perform minimax regret analysis using these minimax theorems. Our contributions include defining a suitable minimax regret in the context of MDPs, finding information-theoretic bounds for it, and applying these bounds in various scenarios.

Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodriguez Gálvez, Tobias Oechtering et al.

This paper studies the Bayesian regret of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for bandit problems, building on the information-theoretic framework introduced by Russo and Van Roy (2015). Specifically, it extends the rate-distortion analysis of Dong and Van Roy (2018), which provides near-optimal bounds for linear bandits. A limitation of these results is the assumption of a finite action space. We address this by extending the analysis to settings with infinite and continuous action spaces. Additionally, we specialize our results to bandit problems with expected rewards that are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the action space, deriving a regret bound that explicitly accounts for the complexity of the action space.

Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodríguez-Gálvez, Tobias J. Oechtering et al.

We study the performance of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for logistic bandit problems. In this setting, an agent receives binary rewards with probabilities determined by a logistic function, $\exp(β\langle a, θ\rangle)/(1+\exp(β\langle a, θ\rangle))$, with slope parameter $β>0$, and where both the action $a\in \mathcal{A}$ and parameter $θ\in \mathcal{O}$ lie within the $d$-dimensional unit ball. Adopting the information-theoretic framework introduced by Russo and Van Roy (2016), we analyze the information ratio, a statistic that quantifies the trade-off between the immediate regret incurred and the information gained about the optimal action. We improve upon previous results by establishing that the information ratio is bounded by $\tfrac{9}{2}dα^{-2}$, where $α$ is a minimax measure of the alignment between the action space $\mathcal{A}$ and the parameter space $\mathcal{O}$, and is independent of $β$. Using this result, we derive a bound of order $O(d/α\sqrt{T \log(βT/d)})$ on the Bayesian expected regret of Thompson Sampling incurred after $T$ time steps. To our knowledge, this is the first regret bound for logistic bandits that depends only logarithmically on $β$ while being independent of the number of actions. In particular, when the action space contains the parameter space, the bound on the expected regret is of order $\tilde{O}(d \sqrt{T})$.

Amaury Gouverneur, Tobias J. Oechtering, Mikael Skoglund

In this paper, we present refined probabilistic bounds on empirical reward estimates for off-policy learning in bandit problems. We build on the PAC-Bayesian bounds from Seldin et al. (2010) and improve on their results using a new parameter optimization approach introduced by Rodríguez et al. (2024). This technique is based on a discretization of the space of possible events to optimize the "in probability" parameter. We provide two parameter-free PAC-Bayes bounds, one based on Hoeffding-Azuma's inequality and the other based on Bernstein's inequality. We prove that our bounds are almost optimal as they recover the same rate as would be obtained by setting the "in probability" parameter after the realization of the data.

Amaury Gouverneur, Borja Rodríguez-Gálvez, Tobias J. Oechtering et al.

This paper studies the Bayesian regret of a variant of the Thompson-Sampling algorithm for bandit problems. It builds upon the information-theoretic framework of [Russo and Van Roy, 2015] and, more specifically, on the rate-distortion analysis from [Dong and Van Roy, 2020], where they proved a bound with regret rate of $O(d\sqrt{T \log(T)})$ for the $d$-dimensional linear bandit setting. We focus on bandit problems with a metric action space and, using a chaining argument, we establish new bounds that depend on the metric entropy of the action space for a variant of Thompson-Sampling. Under suitable continuity assumption of the rewards, our bound offers a tight rate of $O(d\sqrt{T})$ for $d$-dimensional linear bandit problems.