Ruzica Piskac

Stephen Miner, Yoshiki Takashima, Simeng Han et al. · amazon-science

Benchmarks are critical for measuring Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning capabilities. Some benchmarks have even become the de facto indicator of such capabilities. However, as LLM reasoning capabilities improve, existing widely-used benchmarks such as GSM8K marginally encapsulate model reasoning differentials - most state-of-the-art models for example achieve over 94% accuracy on the GSM8K dataset (paperwithcode, 2024). While constructing harder benchmarks is possible, their creation is often manual, expensive, and unscalable. As such, we present Scheherazade, an automated approach to produce large quantities of challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks by logically chaining a small starting set of problems. We propose two different chaining methods, forward chaining and backward chaining, which include randomized branching techniques to generate complex reasoning problems. We apply Scheherazade on GSM8K to create GSM8K-Scheherazade and evaluate 3 frontier LLMs and OpenAI's o1-preview on it. We show that while other frontier models' performance declines precipitously at only a few questions chained, our evaluation suggests o1-preview's performance persists, with the flagship OpenAI model the only one to perform better at backward reasoning. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/YoshikiTakashima/scheherazade-code-data.

Jialu Zhang, José Cambronero, Sumit Gulwani et al.

Students often make mistakes on their introductory programming assignments as part of their learning process. Unfortunately, providing custom repairs for these mistakes can require a substantial amount of time and effort from class instructors. Automated program repair (APR) techniques can be used to synthesize such fixes. Prior work has explored the use of symbolic and neural techniques for APR in the education domain. Both types of approaches require either substantial engineering efforts or large amounts of data and training. We propose to use a large language model trained on code, such as Codex, to build an APR system -- MMAPR -- for introductory Python programming assignments. Our system can fix both syntactic and semantic mistakes by combining multi-modal prompts, iterative querying, test-case-based selection of few-shots, and program chunking. We evaluate MMAPR on 286 real student programs and compare to a baseline built by combining a state-of-the-art Python syntax repair engine, BIFI, and state-of-the-art Python semantic repair engine for student assignments, Refactory. We find that MMAPR can fix more programs and produce smaller patches on average.

Catherine Albiston, Travis Breaux, Kat Dearstyne et al.

The Workshop on Designing Accountable Software Systems (DASS) was convened in November 2024 with support from the U.S. National Science Foundation to engage a wide range of current and future stakeholders from government, academia, and industry on the cross-disciplinary topic of accountability in software systems. Over two days, attendees engaged in a series of panels, invited talks, and breakout sessions covering: (1) the dimensions of accountability, including legal compliance as well as business and societal aspects and drivers; (2) a conceptual model of the various structures needed to realize accountability; (3) the sources of legal requirements that affect software; (4) the operationalization of legal requirements in software; (5) the requirements to preserve evidence needed to conduct investigations; and (6) a range of challenges and contextual factors beyond software that affect why some accountability structures succeed, while others fail. The workshop was conducted as a collaborative systematization of knowledge that culminated in several research directions. The findings include the importance of clarifying definitions and responsibilities within accountable organizations, which can affect whether those researching accountability are making assumptions that limit the generalizability of findings. Further research was also identified as needed to study the ways to improve the translation of accountability structures into the software design process while improving engagement with stakeholders, such as legislators, regulators, business executives and system developers. Finally, a key finding was the high demands that DASS-like research projects place on interdisciplinary teams: both in terms of team formation and sustainment, as well as, the specific demands of cross-disciplinary learning that covers both research methods, research dissemination, and career development.

Xi Zheng, Aloysius K. Mok, Ruzica Piskac et al.

The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits, including enhanced efficiency, predictive capabilities, real-time responsiveness, and the enabling of autonomous operations. This convergence has accelerated the development and deployment of a range of real-world applications, such as autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, service robots, and telemedicine procedures. However, the software development life cycle (SDLC) for AI-infused CPS diverges significantly from traditional approaches, featuring data and learning as two critical components. Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms. In this study, we pinpoint the main challenges in ensuring formal safety for learningenabled CPS.We begin by examining testing as the most pragmatic method for verification and validation, summarizing the current state-of-the-art methodologies. Recognizing the limitations in current testing approaches to provide formal safety guarantees, we propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.

Filip Cano Córdoba, Samuel Judson, Timos Antonopoulos et al.

Principled accountability for autonomous decision-making in uncertain environments requires distinguishing intentional outcomes from negligent designs from actual accidents. We propose analyzing the behavior of autonomous agents through a quantitative measure of the evidence of intentional behavior. We model an uncertain environment as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). For a given scenario, we rely on probabilistic model checking to compute the ability of the agent to influence reaching a certain event. We call this the scope of agency. We say that there is evidence of intentional behavior if the scope of agency is high and the decisions of the agent are close to being optimal for reaching the event. Our method applies counterfactual reasoning to automatically generate relevant scenarios that can be analyzed to increase the confidence of our assessment. In a case study, we show how our method can distinguish between 'intentional' and 'accidental' traffic collisions.

Ferhat Erata, Sam Kouteili, Thanos Typaldos et al.

Despite the effectiveness of Cube-and-Conquer (C&C) for solving challenging Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problems, no prior work has shown that transformer-based models can learn effective cubing heuristics. We introduce a neuro-symbolic post-training framework for this task. We design an MCTS-based data curation pipeline that uses symbolic heuristics to explore splitting decisions over SAT competition formulas, producing preference data grounded in solver statistics and augmented with reasoning traces from a teacher model. Our two-stage post-training, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by direct preference optimization (DPO), enables a 4B-parameter model to achieve a pass@5 score of 53 on 100 SAT competition benchmarks, surpassing frontier LLMs such as Claude-Sonnet-4 (50) and matching the best symbolic heuristic (53). Ablations show that SFT alone improves pass@5 from 46 to 51, with DPO adding 2 additional benchmarks; an entropy/agreement ablation on realized first-cube decisions further shows that SFT, not DPO, accounts for the root-level decision diversity that produces complementary per-run coverage over deterministic symbolic methods. This demonstrates that transformers can be trained to make effective cubing decisions in a domain traditionally dominated by symbolic methods.

Xi Zheng, Ziyang Li, Ivan Ruchkin et al.

Autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPSs) leverage AI for perception, planning, and control but face trust and safety certification challenges due to inherent uncertainties. The neurosymbolic paradigm replaces stochastic layers with interpretable symbolic AI, enabling determinism. While promising, challenges like multisensor fusion, adaptability, and verification remain. This paper introduces NeuroStrata, a neurosymbolic framework to enhance the testing and verification of autonomous CPS. We outline its key components, present early results, and detail future plans.

Ferhat Erata, Orr Paradise, Thanos Typaldos et al. · amazon-science

A self-corrector for a function $f$ takes a black-box oracle computing $f$ that is correct on most inputs and turns it into one that is correct on every input with high probability. Self-correctors exist for any function that is randomly self-reducible (RSR), where the value $f$ at a given point $x$ can be recovered by computing $f$ on random correlated points. While RSRs enable powerful self-correction capabilities and have applications in complexity theory and cryptography, their discovery has traditionally required manual derivation by experts. We present Bitween, a method and tool for automated learning of randomized self-reductions for mathematical functions. We make two key contributions: First, we demonstrate that our learning framework based on linear regression outperforms sophisticated methods including genetic algorithms, symbolic regression, and mixed-integer linear programming for discovering RSRs from correlated samples. Second, we introduce Agentic Bitween, a neuro-symbolic approach where large language models dynamically discover novel query functions for RSR property discovery, leveraging vanilla Bitween as a tool for inference and verification, moving beyond the fixed query functions ($x+r$, $x-r$, $x \cdot r$, $x$, $r$) previously used in the literature. On RSR-Bench, our benchmark suite of 80 scientific and machine learning functions, vanilla Bitween surpasses existing symbolic methods, while Agentic Bitween discovers new RSR properties using frontier models to uncover query functions.

Ning Luo, Qiao Xiang, Timos Antonopoulos et al.

In an interdomain network, autonomous systems (ASes) often establish peering agreements, so that one AS (agreement consumer) can influence the routing policies of the other AS (agreement provider). Peering agreements are implemented in the BGP configuration of the agreement provider. It is crucial to verify their implementation because one error can lead to disastrous consequences. However, the fundamental challenge for peering agreement verification is how to preserve the privacy of both ASes involved in the agreement. To this end, this paper presents IVeri, the first privacy-preserving interdomain agreement verification system. IVeri models the interdomain agreement verification problem as a SAT formula, and develops a novel, efficient, privacy-serving SAT solver, which uses oblivious shuffling and garbled circuits as the key building blocks to let the agreement consumer and provider collaboratively verify the implementation of interdomain peering agreements without exposing their private information. A prototype of IVeri is implemented and evaluated extensively. Results show that IVeri achieves accurate, privacy-preserving interdomain agreement verification with reasonable overhead.

Ferhat Erata, Arda Goknil, Eren Yıldız et al.

Energy harvesting battery-free embedded devices rely only on ambient energy harvesting that enables stand-alone and sustainable IoT applications. These devices execute programs when the harvested ambient energy in their energy reservoir is sufficient to operate and stop execution abruptly (and start charging) otherwise. These intermittent programs have varying timing behavior under different energy conditions, hardware configurations, and program structures. This paper presents Energy-aware Timing Analysis of intermittent Programs (ETAP), a probabilistic symbolic execution approach that analyzes the timing and energy behavior of intermittent programs at compile time. ETAP symbolically executes the given program while taking time and energy cost models for ambient energy and dynamic energy consumption into account. We evaluated ETAP on several intermittent programs and compared the compile-time analysis results with executions on real hardware. The results show that ETAP's normalized prediction accuracy is 99.5%, and it speeds up the timing analysis by at least two orders of magnitude compared to manual testing.

Jialu Zhang, Todd Mytkowicz, Mike Kaufman et al.

Program merging is standard practice when developers integrate their individual changes to a common code base. When the merge algorithm fails, this is called a merge conflict. The conflict either manifests in textual merge conflicts where the merge fails to produce code, or semantic merge conflicts where the merged code results in compiler or test breaks. Resolving these conflicts for large code projects is expensive because it requires developers to manually identify the sources of conflict and correct them. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of automatically repairing merge conflicts (both textual and semantic) using k-shot learning with large neural language models (LM) such as GPT-3. One of the challenges in leveraging such language models is to fit the examples and the queries within a small prompt (2048 tokens). We evaluate LMs and k-shot learning for two broad applications: (a) textual and semantic merge conflicts for a divergent fork Microsoft Edge, and (b) textual merge conflicts for a large number of JavaScript projects in GitHub. Our results are mixed: one one-hand, LMs provide the state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on semantic merge conflict resolution for Edge compared to earlier symbolic approaches; on the other hand, LMs do not yet obviate the benefits of fine-tuning neural models (when sufficient data is available) or the design of special purpose domain-specific languages (DSL) for restricted patterns for program synthesis.

Jialu Zhang, Yitan Wang, Mark Santolucito et al.

The decision tree is one of the most popular and classical machine learning models from the 1980s. However, in many practical applications, decision trees tend to generate decision paths with excessive depth. Long decision paths often cause overfitting problems, and make models difficult to interpret. With longer decision paths, inference is also more likely to fail when the data contain missing values. In this work, we propose a new tree model called Cascading Decision Trees to alleviate this problem. The key insight of Cascading Decision Trees is to separate the decision path and the explanation path. Our experiments show that on average, Cascading Decision Trees generate 63.38% shorter explanation paths, avoiding overfitting and thus achieve higher test accuracy. We also empirically demonstrate that Cascading Decision Trees have advantages in the robustness against missing values.

Kairo Morton, William Hallahan, Elven Shum et al.

Programming-by-example (PBE) is a synthesis paradigm that allows users to generate functions by simply providing input-output examples. While a promising interaction paradigm, synthesis is still too slow for realtime interaction and more widespread adoption. Existing approaches to PBE synthesis have used automated reasoning tools, such as SMT solvers, as well as works applying machine learning techniques. At its core, the automated reasoning approach relies on highly domain specific knowledge of programming languages. On the other hand, the machine learning approaches utilize the fact that when working with program code, it is possible to generate arbitrarily large training datasets. In this work, we propose a system for using machine learning in tandem with automated reasoning techniques to solve Syntax Guided Synthesis (SyGuS) style PBE problems. By preprocessing SyGuS PBE problems with a neural network, we can use a data driven approach to reduce the size of the search space, then allow automated reasoning-based solvers to more quickly find a solution analytically. Our system is able to run atop existing SyGuS PBE synthesis tools, decreasing the runtime of the winner of the 2019 SyGuS Competition for the PBE Strings track by 47.65% to outperform all of the competing tools.

Mark Santolucito, Jialu Zhang, Ennan Zhai et al.

Continuous Integration (CI) testing is a popular software development technique that allows developers to easily check that their code can build successfully and pass tests across various system environments. In order to use a CI platform, a developer must include a set of configuration files to a code repository for specifying build conditions. Incorrect configuration settings lead to CI build failures, which can take hours to run, wasting valuable developer time and delaying product release dates. Debugging CI configurations is challenging because users must manage configurations for the build across many system environments, to which they may not have local access. Thus, the only way to check a CI configuration is to push a commit and wait for the build result. To address this problem, we present the first approach, VeriCI, for statically checking for errors in a given CI configuration before the developer pushes a commit to build on the CI server. Our key insight is that the repositories in a CI environment contain lists of build histories which offer the time-aware repository build status. Driven by this insight, we introduce the Misclassification Guided Abstraction Refinement (MiGAR) loop that automates part of the learning process across the heterogeneous build environments in CI. We then use decision tree learning to generate constraints on the CI configuration that must hold for a build to succeed by training on a large history of continuous integration repository build results. We evaluate VeriCI on real-world data from GitHub and find that we have 83% accuracy of predicting a build failure.