David A. Tomassi

David A. Tomassi, Naji Dmeiri, Yichen Wang et al.

Fault-detection, localization, and repair methods are vital to software quality; but it is difficult to evaluate their generality, applicability, and current effectiveness. Large, diverse, realistic datasets of durably-reproducible faults and fixes are vital to good experimental evaluation of approaches to software quality, but they are difficult and expensive to assemble and keep current. Modern continuous-integration (CI) approaches, like Travis-CI, which are widely used, fully configurable, and executed within custom-built containers, promise a path toward much larger defect datasets. If we can identify and archive failing and subsequent passing runs, the containers will provide a substantial assurance of durable future reproducibility of build and test. Several obstacles, however, must be overcome to make this a practical reality. We describe BugSwarm, a toolset that navigates these obstacles to enable the creation of a scalable, diverse, realistic, continuously growing set of durably reproducible failing and passing versions of real-world, open-source systems. The BugSwarm toolkit has already gathered 3,091 fail-pass pairs, in Java and Python, all packaged within fully reproducible containers. Furthermore, the toolkit can be run periodically to detect fail-pass activities, thus growing the dataset continually.

Sairamvinay Vijayaraghavan, Jinxiao Song, David Tomassi et al.

There is a key demand to automatically generate code for small tasks for developers. Websites such as StackOverflow provide a simplistic way by offering solutions in small snippets which provide a complete answer to whatever task question the developer wants to code. Natural Language Processing and particularly Question-Answering Systems are very helpful in resolving and working on these tasks. In this paper, we develop a two-fold deep learning model: Seq2Seq and a binary classifier that takes in the intent (which is in natural language) and code snippets in Python. We train both the intent and the code utterances in the Seq2Seq model, where we decided to compare the effect of the hidden layer embedding from the encoder for representing the intent and similarly, using the decoder's hidden layer embeddings for the code sequence. Then we combine both these embeddings and then train a simple binary neural network classifier model for predicting if the intent is correctly answered by the predicted code sequence from the seq2seq model. We find that the hidden state layer's embeddings perform slightly better than regular standard embeddings from a constructed vocabulary. We experimented with our tests on the CoNaLa dataset in addition to the StaQC database consisting of simple task-code snippet-based pairs. We empirically establish that using additional pre-trained embeddings for code snippets in Python is less context-based in comparison to using hidden state context vectors from seq2seq models.

David A. Tomassi, Cindy Rubio-González

Datasets play an important role in the advancement of software tools and facilitate their evaluation. BugSwarm is an infrastructure to automatically create a large dataset of real-world reproducible failures and fixes. In this paper, we respond to Durieux and Abreu's critical review of the BugSwarm dataset, referred to in this paper as CriticalReview. We replicate CriticalReview's study and find several incorrect claims and assumptions about the BugSwarm dataset. We discuss these incorrect claims and other contributions listed by CriticalReview. Finally, we discuss general misconceptions about BugSwarm, and our vision for the use of the infrastructure and dataset.