Fergus Buchanan

Yaxiong Lei, Hyochan Cho, Fergus Buchanan et al.

Gaze gestures can provide hands free input on mobile devices, but practical use requires (i) gestures users can learn and recall and (ii) recognition models that are efficient enough for on-device deployment. We present an end-to-end pipeline using commodity ARKit head/eye transforms and a scaffolded guidance-to-recall protocol grounded in learning theory. In a pilot feasibility study (N=4 participants; 240 trials; controlled single-session setting), we benchmark a compact time-series model (TinyHAR) against deeper baselines (DeepConvLSTM, SA-HAR) on 5-way gesture recognition and 4-way user identification. TinyHAR achieves strong performance in this pilot benchmark (Macro F1 = 0.960 for gesture recognition; Macro F1 = 0.997 for user identification) while using only 46k parameters. A modality analysis further indicates that head pose dynamics are highly informative for mobile gaze gestures, highlighting embodied head--eye coordination as a key design consideration. Although the small sample size and controlled setting limit generalizability, these results indicate a potential direction for further investigation into on-device gaze gesture recognition.

Yaxiong Lei, Yuheng Wang, Fergus Buchanan et al.

Mobile gaze tracking involves inferring a user's gaze point or direction on a mobile device's screen from facial images captured by the device's front camera. While this technology inspires an increasing number of gaze-interaction applications, achieving consistent accuracy remains challenging due to dynamic user-device spatial relationships and varied motion conditions inherent in mobile contexts. This paper provides empirical evidence on how user mobility and behaviour affect mobile gaze tracking accuracy. We conduct two user studies collecting behaviour and gaze data under various motion conditions - from lying to maze navigation - and during different interaction tasks. Quantitative analysis has revealed behavioural regularities among daily tasks and identified head distance, head pose, and device orientation as key factors affecting accuracy, with errors increasing by up to 48.91% in dynamic conditions compared to static ones. These findings highlight the need for more robust, adaptive eye-tracking systems that account for head movements and device deflection to maintain accuracy across diverse mobile contexts.