Raimond L. Winslow

Qingchu Jin, Felistas Mazhude, Jamie B. Rabb et al.

Achieving early and timely diagnosis and treatment for disease is a major challenge. Recent applications of machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on patient data have shown promise in many different settings for predicting the patient health state. A challenge often faced when applying these ML algorithms is that at any given time, not all clinical variables (features) needed as input to perform prediction tasks are available. We define the concept of full-feature-capacity (FFC) to refer to prediction performance when such algorithms make use of all features on which they were trained. We then introduce Feature Sufficiency Analysis (FSA) - an analysis for determining whether a subset of all clinical features needed by an AI model is sufficient to achieve FFC. FSA estimates the underlying distributions of missing variables conditioned on features that are available. FSA provides a patient-specific assessment of whether the existing set of measured features achieves FFC. If yes, then there is no need to acquire further inputs and a ML-based prediction. We provide two case studies: prediction of need for postoperative prolonged ventilation in patients recovering from heart surgery; 10-year mortality prediction in an outpatient cohort. We also demonstrate that FSA also provides a clinically interpretable feature-ranking methodology based on prediction sufficiency, identifies intrinsically hard-to-predict patient populations, and has the potential to perform cost-aware optimization for clinical data acquisition. FSA provides a generic computational approach for determining whether incomplete clinical information is sufficient to support trustworthy AI-assisted clinical decision-making, thereby facilitating the prospective deployment of healthcare AI systems across diverse clinical settings.

Ran Liu, Joseph L. Greenstein, James C. Fackler et al.

Guideline-based treatment for sepsis and septic shock is difficult because sepsis is a disparate range of life-threatening organ dysfunctions whose pathophysiology is not fully understood. Early intervention in sepsis is crucial for patient outcome, yet those interventions have adverse effects and are frequently overadministered. Greater personalization is necessary, as no single action is suitable for all patients. We present a novel application of reinforcement learning in which we identify optimal recommendations for sepsis treatment from data, estimate their confidence level, and identify treatment options infrequently observed in training data. Rather than a single recommendation, our method can present several treatment options. We examine learned policies and discover that reinforcement learning is biased against aggressive intervention due to the confounding relationship between mortality and level of treatment received. We mitigate this bias using subspace learning, and develop methodology that can yield more accurate learning policies across healthcare applications.

Han B. Kim, Hieu Nguyen, Qingchu Jin et al.

Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest (CA) face a high risk of neurological disability and death, however pragmatic methods are lacking for accurate and reliable prognostication. The aim of this study was to build computational models to predict post-CA outcome by leveraging high-dimensional patient data available early after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesized that model performance could be enhanced by integrating physiological time series (PTS) data and by training machine learning (ML) classifiers. We compared three models integrating features extracted from the electronic health records (EHR) alone, features derived from PTS collected in the first 24hrs after ICU admission (PTS24), and models integrating PTS24 and EHR. Outcomes of interest were survival and neurological outcome at ICU discharge. Combined EHR-PTS24 models had higher discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) than models which used either EHR or PTS24 alone, for the prediction of survival (AUC 0.85, 0.80 and 0.68 respectively) and neurological outcome (0.87, 0.83 and 0.78). The best ML classifier achieved higher discrimination than the reference logistic regression model (APACHE III) for survival (AUC 0.85 vs 0.70) and neurological outcome prediction (AUC 0.87 vs 0.75). Feature analysis revealed previously unknown factors to be associated with post-CA recovery. Results attest to the effectiveness of ML models for post-CA predictive modeling and suggest that PTS recorded in very early phase after resuscitation encode short-term outcome probabilities.