4.3NAMay 2, 2011
Determinant ApproximationsIlse C. F. Ipsen, Dean J. Lee
A sequence of approximations for the determinant and its logarithm of a complex matrixis derived, along with relative error bounds. The determinant approximations are derived from expansions of det(X)=exp(trace(log(X))), and they apply to non-Hermitian matrices. Examples illustrate that these determinant approximations are efficient for lattice simulations of finite temperature nuclear matter, and that they use significantly less space than Gaussian elimination. The first approximation in the sequence is a block diagonal approximation; it represents an extension of Fischer's and Hadamard's inequalities to non-Hermitian matrices. In the special case of Hermitian positive-definite matrices, block diagonal approximations can be competitive with sparse inverse approximations. At last, a different representation of sparse inverse approximations is given and it is shown that their accuracy increases as more matrix elements are included.
5.9NUCL-THDec 4, 2021
Machine Learning in Nuclear PhysicsAmber Boehnlein, Markus Diefenthaler, Cristiano Fanelli et al.
Advances in machine learning methods provide tools that have broad applicability in scientific research. These techniques are being applied across the diversity of nuclear physics research topics, leading to advances that will facilitate scientific discoveries and societal applications. This Review gives a snapshot of nuclear physics research which has been transformed by machine learning techniques.
2.3NUCL-THJul 28, 2021
Self-learning Emulators and Eigenvector ContinuationAvik Sarkar, Dean Lee
Emulators that can bypass computationally expensive scientific calculations with high accuracy and speed can enable new studies of fundamental science as well as more potential applications. In this work we discuss solving a system of constraint equations efficiently using a self-learning emulator. A self-learning emulator is an active learning protocol that can be used with any emulator that faithfully reproduces the exact solution at selected training points. The key ingredient is a fast estimate of the emulator error that becomes progressively more accurate as the emulator is improved, and the accuracy of the error estimate can be corrected using machine learning. We illustrate with three examples. The first uses cubic spline interpolation to find the solution of a transcendental equation with variable coefficients. The second example compares a spline emulator and a reduced basis method emulator to find solutions of a parameterized differential equation. The third example uses eigenvector continuation to find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a large Hamiltonian matrix that depends on several control parameters.