Qian Ma

Qian Ma, Hongliang Chi, Hengrui Zhang et al.

The rise of self-supervised learning, which operates without the need for labeled data, has garnered significant interest within the graph learning community. This enthusiasm has led to the development of numerous Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) techniques, all aiming to create a versatile graph encoder that leverages the wealth of unlabeled data for various downstream tasks. However, the current evaluation standards for GCL approaches are flawed due to the need for extensive hyper-parameter tuning during pre-training and the reliance on a single downstream task for assessment. These flaws can skew the evaluation away from the intended goals, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. In our paper, we thoroughly examine these shortcomings and offer fresh perspectives on how GCL methods are affected by hyper-parameter choices and the choice of downstream tasks for their evaluation. Additionally, we introduce an enhanced evaluation framework designed to more accurately gauge the effectiveness, consistency, and overall capability of GCL methods.

Qian Ma, Ziping Ye

Adversarial examples are a major problem for machine learning models, leading to a continuous search for effective defenses. One promising direction is to leverage model explanations to better understand and defend against these attacks. We looked at AmI, a method proposed by a NeurIPS 2018 spotlight paper that uses model explanations to detect adversarial examples. Our study shows that while AmI is a promising idea, its performance is too dependent on specific settings (e.g., hyperparameter) and external factors such as the operating system and the deep learning framework used, and such drawbacks limit AmI's practical usage. Our findings highlight the need for more robust defense mechanisms that are effective under various conditions. In addition, we advocate for a comprehensive evaluation framework for defense techniques.