Kaspar Anton Schindler

Francesco Stefano Carzaniga, Gary Tom Hoppeler, Michael Hersche et al.

All data modalities are not created equal, even when the signal they measure comes from the same source. In the case of the brain, two of the most important data modalities are the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), and the intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG). They are used by human experts, supported by deep learning (DL) models, to accomplish a variety of tasks, such as seizure detection and motor imagery classification. Although the differences between EEG and iEEG are well understood by human experts, the performance of DL models across these two modalities remains under-explored. To help characterize the importance of clean data on the performance of DL models, we propose BrainCodec, a high-fidelity EEG and iEEG neural compressor. We find that training BrainCodec on iEEG and then transferring to EEG yields higher reconstruction quality than training on EEG directly. In addition, we also find that training BrainCodec on both EEG and iEEG improves fidelity when reconstructing EEG. Our work indicates that data sources with higher SNR, such as iEEG, provide better performance across the board also in the medical time-series domain. BrainCodec also achieves up to a 64x compression on iEEG and EEG without a notable decrease in quality. BrainCodec markedly surpasses current state-of-the-art compression models both in final compression ratio and in reconstruction fidelity. We also evaluate the fidelity of the compressed signals objectively on a seizure detection and a motor imagery task performed by standard DL models. Here, we find that BrainCodec achieves a reconstruction fidelity high enough to ensure no performance degradation on the downstream tasks. Finally, we collect the subjective assessment of an expert neurologist, that confirms the high reconstruction quality of BrainCodec in a realistic scenario. The code is available at https://github.com/IBM/eeg-ieeg-brain-compressor.

Kaspar Anton Schindler

Distributed computational substrates rely on two elementary operations: bundling, the act of populating a shared physical medium with independently retrievable components, and binding, the act of composing components into outputs whose identity depends on their relations. We study these two primitives on the simplest closed substrate carrying a continuous symmetry, a cycle graph of N nodes, in two parameter regimes of a single master equation of motion. The linear regime sorts a temporal input across the substrate's U(1)-organised eigenmodes, providing a feature representation that matches a windowed-FFT baseline at high signal-to-noise ratio and modestly outperforms it for transient signals at low SNR. The Duffing regime activates a cubic mode-mixing operation constrained by the substrate's symmetry into a sparse selection rule on integer wavenumbers, generating shape-dependent harmonic content that the linear regime cannot produce. We identify a single-number observable, $ϕ_0$, that summarises the bound representation's response to input shape, and we analyse its symmetry structure: a $π$-periodicity in the shape parameter is exact, while a time-reversal symmetry that would render $ϕ_0$ degenerate is broken by the substrate's dissipation. The asymmetric status of these two symmetries is what licenses $ϕ_0$ as a meaningful single-number observable; its trajectory across the quotient domain encodes the joint response of binding and dissipation to the input shape. Numerical experiments confirm that $ϕ_0$ retains its information content under additive band-limited noise, with seed-averaged means staying clearly above the symmetric-attractor value down to 0 dB input SNR. The framework is developed on synthetic signals only; extensions to richer substrates, more elaborate drives, and real biological signals are open questions for the work that follows.