Ryoma Kobayashi

Ryoma Kobayashi, Yusuke Mukuta, Tatsuya Harada

Learning from Label Proportions (LLP) is a weakly supervised learning method that aims to perform instance classification from training data consisting of pairs of bags containing multiple instances and the class label proportions within the bags. Previous studies on multiclass LLP can be divided into two categories according to the learning task: per-instance label classification and per-bag label proportion estimation. However, these methods often results in high variance estimates of the risk when applied to complex models, or lack statistical learning theory arguments. To address this issue, we propose new learning methods based on statistical learning theory for both per-instance and per-bag policies. We demonstrate that the proposed methods are respectively risk-consistent and classifier-consistent in an instance-wise manner, and analyze the estimation error bounds. Additionally, we present a heuristic approximation method that utilizes an existing method for regressing label proportions to reduce the computational complexity of the proposed methods. Through benchmark experiments, we demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Daisuke Matsumoto, Tomohiro Kikuchi, Yusuke Takagi et al.

Rationale and Objectives: Computer-aided detection systems for chest radiographs are widely used, and concurrent reader displays, such as bounding-box (BB) highlights, may influence the reading process. This pilot study used eye tracking to conduct a preliminary experiment to quantify which aspects of visual search were affected. Materials and Methods: We sampled 180 chest radiographs from the VinDR-CXR dataset: 120 with solitary pulmonary nodules or masses and 60 without. The BBs were configured to yield an overall display sensitivity and specificity of 80%. Three radiologists (with 11, 5, and 1 years of experience, respectively) interpreted each case twice - once with BBs visible and once without - after a washout of >= 2 weeks. Eye movements were recorded using an EyeTech VT3 Mini. Metrics included interpretation time, time to first fixation on the lesion, lesion dwell time, total gaze-path length, and lung-field coverage ratio. Outcomes were modeled using a linear mixed model, with reading condition as a fixed effect and case and reader as random intercepts. The primary analysis was restricted to true positives (n=96). Results: Concurrent BB display prolonged interpretation time by 4.9 s (p<0.001) and increased lesion dwell time by 1.3 s (p<0.001). Total gaze-path length increased by 2,076 pixels (p<0.001), and lung-field coverage ratio increased by 10.5% (p<0.001). Time to first fixation on the lesion was reduced by 1.3 s (p<0.001). Conclusion: Eye tracking captured measurable alterations in search behavior associated with concurrent BB displays during chest radiograph interpretation. These findings support the feasibility of this approach and highlight the need for larger studies to confirm effects and explore implications across modalities and clinical contexts.