Djura Smits

Hyunho Mo, Djura Smits, Mahlet A. Birhanu et al.

Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models often rely on data from a single institution or centrally pooled datasets. Extending these models across institutions could be limited by privacy regulations and constraints on sharing patient-level data. Federated learning enables collaborative model development without transferring sensitive patient data, but its application in healthcare remains challenging because datasets often differ in size, population characteristics, and outcome definitions. In this study, we present a federated deep learning approach for privacy-preserving cardiovascular disease risk prediction that integrates two population-based cohorts with different characteristics: Lifelines, including 148,230 participants meeting the study inclusion criteria with self-reported outcomes, and the Rotterdam Study, including a smaller cohort of 10,155 participants with digitally linked clinical outcomes. Model performance was primarily evaluated on the Rotterdam Study because of its complete follow-up. Deep survival models trained using federated learning achieved higher predictive performance than models trained locally without federation. For the Rotterdam Study, the C-statistic increased from 0.728 (95% CI: 0.717-0.739) to 0.739 (95% CI: 0.728-0.749). For Lifelines, the C-statistic increased from 0.783 (95% CI: 0.775-0.791) to 0.787 (95% CI: 0.780-0.792). These findings suggest that federated deep learning across heterogeneous cohorts can improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction while preserving the privacy of individual-level patient data.

Robin A Richardson, Remzi Celebi, Sven van der Burg et al.

There has been a large focus in recent years on making assets in scientific research findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, collectively known as the FAIR principles. A particular area of focus lies in applying these principles to scientific computational workflows. Jupyter notebooks are a very popular medium by which to program and communicate computational scientific analyses. However, they present unique challenges when it comes to reuse of only particular steps of an analysis without disrupting the usual flow and benefits of the notebook approach, making it difficult to fully comply with the FAIR principles. Here we present an approach and toolset for adding the power of semantic technologies to Python-encoded scientific workflows in a simple, automated and minimally intrusive manner. The semantic descriptions are published as a series of nanopublications that can be searched and used in other notebooks by means of a Jupyter Lab plugin. We describe the implementation of the proposed approach and toolset, and provide the results of a user study with 15 participants, designed around image processing workflows, to evaluate the usability of the system and its perceived effect on FAIRness. Our results show that our approach is feasible and perceived as user-friendly. Our system received an overall score of 78.75 on the System Usability Scale, which is above the average score reported in the literature.