Hung P. Hoang

h-index4
3papers
61citations

3 Papers

10.4DSJul 16
Parameterized Complexity of Efficient Sortation

Robert Ganian, Hung P. Hoang, Simon Wietheger

A crucial challenge arising in the design of large-scale logistical networks is to optimize parcel sortation for routing. We study this problem under the recent graph-theoretic formalization of Van Dyk, Klause, Koenemann and Megow (IPCO 2024). The problem asks - given an input digraph D (the fulfillment network) together with a set of commodities represented as source-sink tuples - for a minimum-outdegree subgraph H of the transitive closure of D that contains a source-sink route for each of the commodities. Given the underlying motivation, we study two variants of the problem which differ in whether the routes for the commodities are assumed to be given, or can be chosen arbitrarily. We perform a thorough parameterized analysis of the complexity of both problems. Our results concentrate on three fundamental parameterizations of the problem: (1) When attempting to parameterize by the target outdegree of H, we show that the problems are paraNP-hard even in highly restricted cases; (2) When parameterizing by the number of commodities, we utilize Ramsey-type arguments and color-coding techniques to obtain parameterized algorithms for both problems; (3) When parameterizing by the structure of D, we establish fixed-parameter tractability for both problems w.r.t. treewidth, maximum degree and the maximum routing length. We combine this with lower bounds which show that omitting any of the three parameters results in paraNP-hardness.

1.2DSDec 3, 2025
Matrix Editing Meets Fair Clustering: Parameterized Algorithms and Complexity

Robert Ganian, Hung P. Hoang, Simon Wietheger

We study the computational problem of computing a fair means clustering of discrete vectors, which admits an equivalent formulation as editing a colored matrix into one with few distinct color-balanced rows by changing at most $k$ values. While NP-hard in both the fairness-oblivious and the fair settings, the problem is well-known to admit a fixed-parameter algorithm in the former ``vanilla'' setting. As our first contribution, we exclude an analogous algorithm even for highly restricted fair means clustering instances. We then proceed to obtain a full complexity landscape of the problem, and establish tractability results which capture three means of circumventing our obtained lower bound: placing additional constraints on the problem instances, fixed-parameter approximation, or using an alternative parameterization targeting tree-like matrices.

7.4DSMay 4
Fine-Grained Complexity of Computing Degree-Constrained Spanning Trees

Narek Bojikian, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian et al.

We investigate the computation of minimum-cost spanning trees satisfying prescribed vertex degree constraints: Given a graph $G$ and a constraint function $D$, we ask for a (minimum-cost) spanning tree $T$ such that for each vertex $v$, $T$ achieves a degree specified by $D(v)$. Specifically, we consider three kinds of constraint functions ordered by their generality -- $D$ may either assign each vertex to a list of admissible degrees, an upper bound on the degrees, or a specific degree. Using a combination of novel techniques and state-of-the-art machinery, we obtain an almost-complete overview of the fine-grained complexity of these problems taking into account the most classical graph parameters of the input graph $G$. In particular, we present SETH-tight upper and lower bounds for these problems when parameterized by the pathwidth and cutwidth, an ETH-tight algorithm parameterized by the cliquewidth, and a nearly SETH-tight algorithm parameterized by treewidth. In order to obtain our upper bound for clique-width, we develop a novel technique of double representation through ``requirement shifting''. Using this technique, we also obtain an ETH-tight single-exponential XP algorithm for the Exact Leaf Spanning Tree problem parameterized by clique-width, which settles the final remaining open case for clique-width from the classical Cut and Count of Cygan et al. [FOCS 2011, TALG 2022]. This shows the versatility of our technique and its potential applicability to other problems as well. Additionally, in order to establish our lower and upper bounds we introduce a number of tools which may be of independent interest, including lazy coloring and ``asymptotic'' SETH-based reductions for structural parameters.