Rahul Pandey

Mengying Wang, Nicolaas Jedema, Rahul Pandey et al.

Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) has advanced through structured query generation, yet most efforts target RDF/SPARQL, leaving Cypher and property graphs underexplored, despite increasing demand for unified KGQA in industry settings. We propose UniQGen, a novel constraint-based framework that employs LLM agents to dynamically extract and refine representative graph query clauses into executable, intent-aligned graph queries across query languages. The foundation of our method is a variant of Chase & Backchase, a family of algorithms for query optimization and reformulation. We extend Chase & Backchase with a dynamic reasoning process over query constraints that also interact with LLMs for query quality estimation. With a Cypher-supported Freebase graph deployed on Amazon Neptune, we extensively evaluate our approach on popular KGQA benchmarks (GraphQ, GrailQA, and WebQSP). We demonstrate that UniQGen outperforms state-of-the-art graph query generation techniques in both accuracy and efficiency, with F1 gains of 31.6% on GraphQ and 4.9% on GrailQA. Unlike prior methods, our framework does not require fine-tuning for schema matching, making it more extensible to schema-less graphs and semantics in query workloads, and is more suitable for enterprise-grade KGQA. We release Cypher outputs and a Neptune-ready Freebase snapshot to support reproducible, cross-language KGQA research.

Jiajun Fan, Roger Ren, Jingyuan Li et al.

The role of reasoning in Audio Large Language Models remains widely underexplored, as introducing a reasoning process often degrades rather than improves performance during inference, a phenomenon we term test-time inverse scaling, where longer reasoning chains yield progressively worse results. We demonstrate that this stems not from fundamental limitations of reasoning itself, but from inadequate training: models without proper guidance for the reasoning process produce hallucinatory, inconsistent reasoning that accumulates errors over longer chains. To address these challenges, we introduce CESAR (Consistent, Effective, and Scalable Audio Reasoners), shifting from outcome verification to rewarding the reasoning process. Our online reinforcement learning framework employs Group Relative Policy Optimization with a multi-faceted reward suite that incentivizes not only correctness and format but also consistency, structured analytical patterns, causal reasoning, domain-knowledge integration, and calibrated reasoning depth. CESAR resolves test-time inverse scaling, transforming reasoning from detriments into gains while revealing model-specific ``reasoning sweet spots", where performance peaks during test-time scaling. We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks. Through AI-as-judge evaluations and qualitative comparisons, we provide both quantitative and qualitative validation of our improved reasoning quality. Importantly, enhanced reasoning creates synergistic effects, simultaneously improving multimodal reasoning and perception capabilities. Overall, CESAR establishes a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio LLMs.

Rahul Pandey, Ziwei Zhu, Hemant Purohit

Effective labeled data collection plays a critical role in developing and fine-tuning robust streaming analytics systems. However, continuously labeling documents to filter relevant information poses significant challenges like limited labeling budget or lack of high-quality labels. There is a need for efficient human-in-the-loop machine learning (HITL-ML) design to improve streaming analytics systems. One particular HITL- ML approach is online active learning, which involves iteratively selecting a small set of the most informative documents for labeling to enhance the ML model performance. The performance of such algorithms can get affected due to human errors in labeling. To address these challenges, we propose ORIS, a method to perform Online active learning using Reinforcement learning-based Inclusive Sampling of documents for labeling. ORIS aims to create a novel Deep Q-Network-based strategy to sample incoming documents that minimize human errors in labeling and enhance the ML model performance. We evaluate the ORIS method on emotion recognition tasks, and it outperforms traditional baselines in terms of both human labeling performance and the ML model performance.

Rahul Pandey, Hemant Purohit, Carlos Castillo et al.

High-quality human annotations are necessary for creating effective machine learning-driven stream processing systems. We study hybrid stream processing systems based on a Human-In-The-Loop Machine Learning (HITL-ML) paradigm, in which one or many human annotators and an automatic classifier (trained at least partially by the human annotators) label an incoming stream of instances. This is typical of many near-real-time social media analytics and web applications, including annotating social media posts during emergencies by digital volunteer groups. From a practical perspective, low-quality human annotations result in wrong labels for retraining automated classifiers and indirectly contribute to the creation of inaccurate classifiers. Considering human annotation as a psychological process allows us to address these limitations. We show that human annotation quality is dependent on the ordering of instances shown to annotators and can be improved by local changes in the instance sequence/order provided to the annotators, yielding a more accurate annotation of the stream. We adapt a theoretically-motivated human error framework of mistakes and slips for the human annotation task to study the effect of ordering instances (i.e., an "annotation schedule"). Further, we propose an error-avoidance approach to the active learning paradigm for stream processing applications robust to these likely human errors (in the form of slips) when deciding a human annotation schedule. We support the human error framework using crowdsourcing experiments and evaluate the proposed algorithm against standard baselines for active learning via extensive experimentation on classification tasks of filtering relevant social media posts during natural disasters.

Rahul Pandey, Carlos Castillo, Hemant Purohit

High-quality human annotations are necessary to create effective machine learning systems for social media. Low-quality human annotations indirectly contribute to the creation of inaccurate or biased learning systems. We show that human annotation quality is dependent on the ordering of instances shown to annotators (referred as 'annotation schedule'), and can be improved by local changes in the instance ordering provided to the annotators, yielding a more accurate annotation of the data stream for efficient real-time social media analytics. We propose an error-mitigating active learning algorithm that is robust with respect to some cases of human errors when deciding an annotation schedule. We validate the human error model and evaluate the proposed algorithm against strong baselines by experimenting on classification tasks of relevant social media posts during crises. According to these experiments, considering the order in which data instances are presented to human annotators leads to both an increase in accuracy for machine learning and awareness toward some potential biases in human learning that may affect the automated classifier.

Julian McAuley, Rahul Pandey, Jure Leskovec

In a modern recommender system, it is important to understand how products relate to each other. For example, while a user is looking for mobile phones, it might make sense to recommend other phones, but once they buy a phone, we might instead want to recommend batteries, cases, or chargers. These two types of recommendations are referred to as substitutes and complements: substitutes are products that can be purchased instead of each other, while complements are products that can be purchased in addition to each other. Here we develop a method to infer networks of substitutable and complementary products. We formulate this as a supervised link prediction task, where we learn the semantics of substitutes and complements from data associated with products. The primary source of data we use is the text of product reviews, though our method also makes use of features such as ratings, specifications, prices, and brands. Methodologically, we build topic models that are trained to automatically discover topics from text that are successful at predicting and explaining such relationships. Experimentally, we evaluate our system on the Amazon product catalog, a large dataset consisting of 9 million products, 237 million links, and 144 million reviews.