Shanchao Yang

Shanchao Yang, Jing Liu, Kai Wu et al.

Deep learning based approaches have been utilized to model and generate graphs subjected to different distributions recently. However, they are typically unsupervised learning based and unconditioned generative models or simply conditioned on the graph-level contexts, which are not associated with rich semantic node-level contexts. Differently, in this paper, we are interested in a novel problem named Time Series Conditioned Graph Generation: given an input multivariate time series, we aim to infer a target relation graph modeling the underlying interrelationships between time series with each node corresponding to each time series. For example, we can study the interrelationships between genes in a gene regulatory network of a certain disease conditioned on their gene expression data recorded as time series. To achieve this, we propose a novel Time Series conditioned Graph Generation-Generative Adversarial Networks (TSGG-GAN) to handle challenges of rich node-level context structures conditioning and measuring similarities directly between graphs and time series. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-word gene regulatory networks datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of the proposed TSGG-GAN.

Silvia Lopez, Aaron Gross, Scott Yang et al.

Clinical electroencephalographic (EEG) data varies significantly depending on a number of operational conditions (e.g., the type and placement of electrodes, the type of electrical grounding used). This investigation explores the statistical differences present in two different referential montages: Linked Ear (LE) and Averaged Reference (AR). Each of these accounts for approximately 45% of the data in the TUH EEG Corpus. In this study, we explore the impact this variability has on machine learning performance. We compare the statistical properties of features generated using these two montages, and explore the impact of performance on our standard Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based classification system. We show that a system trained on LE data significantly outperforms one trained only on AR data (77.2% vs. 61.4%). We also demonstrate that performance of a system trained on both data sets is somewhat compromised (71.4% vs. 77.2%). A statistical analysis of the data suggests that mean, variance and channel normalization should be considered. However, cepstral mean subtraction failed to produce an improvement in performance, suggesting that the impact of these statistical differences is subtler.