Antonio Filieri

Xiaotong Ji, Antonio Filieri

Safe exploration aims at addressing the limitations of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in safety-critical scenarios, where failures during trial-and-error learning may incur high costs. Several methods exist to incorporate external knowledge or to use proximal sensor data to limit the exploration of unsafe states. However, reducing exploration risks in unknown environments, where an agent must discover safety threats during exploration, remains challenging. In this paper, we target the problem of safe exploration by guiding the training with counterexamples of the safety requirement. Our method abstracts both continuous and discrete state-space systems into compact abstract models representing the safety-relevant knowledge acquired by the agent during exploration. We then exploit probabilistic counterexample generation to construct minimal simulation submodels eliciting safety requirement violations, where the agent can efficiently train offline to refine its policy towards minimising the risk of safety violations during the subsequent online exploration. We demonstrate our method's effectiveness in reducing safety violations during online exploration in preliminary experiments by an average of 40.3% compared with QL and DQN standard algorithms and 29.1% compared with previous related work, while achieving comparable cumulative rewards with respect to unrestricted exploration and alternative approaches.

Xiaotong Ji, Hanchun Wang, Antonio Filieri et al.

Probabilistic model checking traditionally verifies properties on the expected value of a measure of interest. This restriction may fail to capture the quality of service of a significant proportion of a system's runs, especially when the probability distribution of the measure of interest is poorly represented by its expected value due to heavy-tail behaviors or multiple modalities. Recent works inspired by distributional reinforcement learning use discrete histograms to approximate integer reward distribution, but they struggle with continuous reward space and present challenges in balancing accuracy and scalability. We propose a novel method for handling both continuous and discrete reward distributions in Discrete Time Markov Chains using moment matching with Erlang mixtures. By analytically deriving higher-order moments through Moment Generating Functions, our method approximates the reward distribution with theoretically bounded error while preserving the statistical properties of the true distribution. This detailed distributional insight enables the formulation and robust model checking of quality properties based on the entire reward distribution function, rather than restricting to its expected value. We include a theoretical foundation ensuring bounded approximation errors, along with an experimental evaluation demonstrating our method's accuracy and scalability in practical model-checking problems.

Yicheng Luo, Antonio Filieri, Yuan Zhou

Probabilistic software analysis aims at quantifying the probability of a target event occurring during the execution of a program processing uncertain incoming data or written itself using probabilistic programming constructs. Recent techniques combine symbolic execution with model counting or solution space quantification methods to obtain accurate estimates of the occurrence probability of rare target events, such as failures in a mission-critical system. However, they face several scalability and applicability limitations when analyzing software processing with high-dimensional and correlated multivariate input distributions. In this paper, we present SYMbolic Parallel Adaptive Importance Sampling (SYMPAIS), a new inference method tailored to analyze path conditions generated from the symbolic execution of programs with high-dimensional, correlated input distributions. SYMPAIS combines results from importance sampling and constraint solving to produce accurate estimates of the satisfaction probability for a broad class of constraints that cannot be analyzed by current solution space quantification methods. We demonstrate SYMPAIS's generality and performance compared with state-of-the-art alternatives on a set of problems from different application domains.

Paul Ralph, Nauman bin Ali, Sebastian Baltes et al.

Empirical Standards are natural-language models of a scientific community's expectations for a specific kind of study (e.g. a questionnaire survey). The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality Initiative generated empirical standards for research methods commonly used in software engineering. These living documents, which should be continuously revised to reflect evolving consensus around research best practices, will improve research quality and make peer review more effective, reliable, transparent and fair.

Domenico Bianculli, Antonio Filieri, Carlo Ghezzi et al.

Software verification of evolving systems is challenging mainstream methodologies and tools. Formal verification techniques often conflict with the time constraints imposed by change management practices for evolving systems. Since changes in these systems are often local to restricted parts, an incremental verification approach could be beneficial. This paper introduces SiDECAR, a general framework for the definition of verification procedures, which are made incremental by the framework itself. Verification procedures are driven by the syntactic structure (defined by a grammar) of the system and encoded as semantic attributes associated with the grammar. Incrementality is achieved by coupling the evaluation of semantic attributes with an incremental parsing technique. We show the application of SiDECAR to the definition of two verification procedures: probabilistic verification of reliability requirements and verification of safety properties.