Farnam Mansouri

2papers

2 Papers

1.8LGDec 24, 2022
A Labelled Sample Compression Scheme of Size at Most Quadratic in the VC Dimension

Farnam Mansouri, Sandra Zilles

This paper presents a construction of a proper and stable labelled sample compression scheme of size $O(\VCD^2)$ for any finite concept class, where $\VCD$ denotes the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension. The construction is based on a well-known model of machine teaching, referred to as recursive teaching dimension. This substantially improves on the currently best known bound on the size of sample compression schemes (due to Moran and Yehudayoff), which is exponential in $\VCD$. The long-standing open question whether the smallest size of a sample compression scheme is in $O(\VCD)$ remains unresolved, but our results show that research on machine teaching is a promising avenue for the study of this open problem. As further evidence of the strong connections between machine teaching and sample compression, we prove that the model of no-clash teaching, introduced by Kirkpatrick et al., can be used to define a non-trivial lower bound on the size of stable sample compression schemes.

11.4LGJul 10, 2025
Learning from positive and unlabeled examples -Finite size sample bounds

Farnam Mansouri, Shai Ben-David

PU (Positive Unlabeled) learning is a variant of supervised classification learning in which the only labels revealed to the learner are of positively labeled instances. PU learning arises in many real-world applications. Most existing work relies on the simplifying assumptions that the positively labeled training data is drawn from the restriction of the data generating distribution to positively labeled instances and/or that the proportion of positively labeled points (a.k.a. the class prior) is known apriori to the learner. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the statistical complexity of PU learning under a wider range of setups. Unlike most prior work, our study does not assume that the class prior is known to the learner. We prove upper and lower bounds on the required sample sizes (of both the positively labeled and the unlabeled samples).